• Blaze@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s kind of interesting, it’s not even mine, just something I took from elsewhere.

      Was it necessary to be this agressive?

      Anyway, have a good one.

      • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s just kind of annoying. People that complain about these things yet they are the exact reason it exists because they continue paying.

        • Blaze@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I see where you come from, but that’s why it’s infuriating: it’s the greed of the corporations, rather than not so tech-savy users wanting to use a service that provides them entertainment.

          Anyway

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      The whole channel is kinda going to shit. Even as streaming services go, they rank behind Netflix and Apple.

      But they’ve got a brand that people cannot resist. So we keep drinking their garbage.

  • PunnyName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m broke AF, but that might actually still be a good price if you’re regularly using the service. Inflation is one, I’m sure, as well as the inclusion of Hulu and their library moving back to their services.

    You can pay or not.

      • woop_woop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago
        • Pay for luxury service
        • Service gets more expensive
        • Keep paying for service
        • Service gets more expensive
        • Complain about cost, goto 1

        It’s hard to have pity for people who do this, especially if enough people stopped, the service would get cheaper.

              • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Naw. Im a coughsailor.I have all the media… my kids have seen it all commercial free.

                main cost was storage, even that wasnt near these subscription fees

              • oo1@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                I thought Disney was “nearly a requirement” . . . sounds to like those precious few who can manage without might have some useful information.
                Typically this is what happens in a free competitive market, when a price goes up people look for substitutes.
                And if they face constraints in moving to the substitute, they will benefit from help in loosening those constraints.

          • Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            You got libraries where you are?

            Mine does online rentals for digital products (movies, TV, audiobooks, ebooks).

          • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            What a first world take on this, it’s not a requirement at all. Parent your fucking children. My kids watch D+ maybe once or twice a month, my wife and I honestly watch it more frequently than they do because they have shows we like. We could drop it tomorrow if our budget needed to be trimmed.

            • bassomitron@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              A fairly aggressive comment. I’m not the person you replied to, but as a parent with young ones, there are times where TV is literally an enormous rescuer. For example, just a couple of months ago, the entire family got hit with an extremely nasty stomach bug. I could barely walk without needing to either throw up or shit my pants. Being able to setup a little triage center in our living room for us and the kids, where we napped and watched movies all day, made that experience at least mostly bearable.

              There are numerous other cases where modern technology makes parenting far easier. Back in the day, communities were much closer knit and extended family lived within the neighborhood, so parents had a lot more backup to help in those situations. Nowadays, that kind of support network is increasingly rare for parents to have. So yes, it’s a luxury, but it should be an accessible luxury. Private companies are free to do what they want, doesn’t mean we can’t complain about it while begrudgingly continuing to pay for it.

      • Blaze@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Edit: Never thought I’d get so much anger and hate from people in a Disney+ post. I don’t have children and I don’t have Disney.

        Sorry you went through this. Feel free to report any agressive comment, hopefully the mods will act upon them.

      • malloc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Imagine being so poor you can’t buy the physical media, rip it to your media server, and stream at anytime.

        Lol, enjoy your shitty subpar streaming service that serves media at less than 4K while paying increasing monthly costs.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I’d also point out that Disney’s parks are on the pricey side. Like, they do provide a lot of nice stuff, but it’s not like they’re the only amusement park operator out there.

        googles

        A few years back, but I imagine the ratios probably roughly hold.

        https://www.businessinsider.com/cost-us-theme-parks-ranked-disney-six-flags-2018-5?op=1

        On this list of 45 amusement parks in the US ranked by cost, Disney World is #2, Disney Adventure Park is #3, Disneyland is #4, and Disney’s Animal Kingdom is #5.

        If someone wants to go to an amusement park and isn’t specifically set on what Disney has on offer, there are a number of other options that are more-affordable.

      • malloc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I also suspect there’s a dark pattern where the subscriber just forgets it is on autopay.

        I want to hope that the person that posted this screenshot disabled auto renewal.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Its a luxury service in a declining economy, when everything is getting shittier and shittier and people will pay through the nose for relief. Why wouldn’t they charge more?

      • jettrscga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is one of my worries with a growing wealth disparity in the world.

        The average person is starting to get priced out of any luxury entertainment because there are wealthy people with unreasonable amounts of money to throw at whatever they feel like.

        There will always be rich people who can pay whatever price a company asks for.

    • CarlosCheddar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      We’ll have to wait and see if they get away with it. I may be OK paying more if I already had my mind set on going and didn’t know about the price hike but if the experience is not worth it I won’t visit again.

      Went to Epcot in November 2022 and it was the time when I paid the most and the park looked like a husk of its former self. Now I will actively avoid the parks for the foreseeable future.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      And to be honest, I can’t blame them when people keep buying it and they’re still keeping the parks full.

      I mean, for the parks, I’d increase the price to what the market could bear at the capacity the parks have, but also build more park, if there’s that much demand.

      googles

      Apparently they actually do have a 14 acre expansion happening at Disney World at the moment.

      https://www.cnn.com/2024/04/04/travel/disney-expansion-magic-kingdom-10-year-investment/index.html

      But park visitors can one day expect to see much more beyond that wilderness at the iconic park in Central Florida – something more ambitious than just a ride overhaul or a retheming.

      “It’s probably the largest expansion ever at Magic Kingdom,” Michael Hundgen, Walt Disney World site portfolio executive, said Tuesday during a rare media event previewing new Disney attraction designs and technology at its Walt Disney Imagineering facility in California.

      He said the expansion will be about the size of Star Wars Galaxy’s Edge, which occupies about 14 acres. A Disney team is currently on research trips and going through concept design for this expansion area.

      I don’t know if that’s enough to substantially increase supply, though.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      goes to check how much actually is

      https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/

      This is only using yearly resolution, but given inflation from 2021 to 2024, $79.18 in 2021 would be $85.51 in 2024.

      That’s 8.95% of the increase from inflation, and 91.05% of the increase being a real increase.

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s like when the ISPs area me offer me a 'better Price’s then my current internet plan…I know it’s always bullshit and I refuse to accept the ‘deal’ that they can revoke at any moment and increase the cost of.

  • andrewta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I can buy 7 movies on physical media for that yearly price. Maybe it’s time to end that subscription.

    • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Fewer than one a month?

      I guess a good heuristic is if you don’t watch one or two movies a month on Disney, you should drop Disney makes sense.

      • andrewta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I can see why you would come up with that number. The reality is I tend to watch my movies multiple times. This would give me seven new movies per year. On top of all the other movies already own. Plus I still have cable TV, which there’s a good chance I may shut that down and just go with antenna. Which would still give me all of my local channels.

        Right now I buy on Blu-ray, but there’s a good chance I’ll probably start buying on 4K once I get my new TV.

        • just_change_it@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I pay for a single netflix sub, crunchyroll, and a vpn service.

          After netflix announced ads i’ve been more and more considering dumping them and just focusing on that vpn service. I have paid for years and years of streaming services but I can’t possibly comprehend how prices need to go up again and again, almost always by double digit percentage points. The cost of storage and bandwidth goes down over time, servers get cheaper over time… there’s hardly any first party new media that is worth watching so i’m struggling to understand why i’m paying more.

          The most bizarre thing to me though are people who pay for live TV… why in the world would you ever do that in 2024 with all the better options out there?

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Why are you paying for this bullshit?

    Even if it weren’t going up every year. It would still be Disney, an evil as Fuck company.

  • radix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Turns out the 80s fearmongering of shoving free/cheap drugs at kids to get them addicted, then jack up the price was prescient after all.

    Just with digital subscription drugs instead of narcotics.

    Don’t do subscriptions, m’kay?

  • malloc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yet the person continues to pay it every single year.

    The only subscription that I pay for is subsidized by my cellular provider. Otherwise, my subscriptions would be $0 per month.