• pewpew@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not all people who pollute are capitalits, in fact you may be one of them

        • 10_0@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          It would be the same under communism, the ways we make electricity doesn’t change overnight, either system can change, its about having the demand and the supply to fill it. Also ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=clGyOL_UwN0 it details how the Soviets caused a lot of environmental damage, pre and post communism.)

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            7 months ago

            Capitalism drives pollution because the cheapest path to profit is also destructive towards the environment, and legislating against the profit motive is difficult because the state serves Capitalists.

            Socialism fixes this by valuing needs and uses over profit.

            The Soviet Union failed to properly implement environmental protections because climate science wasn’t as developed and the Soviet Union was a developing country.

            • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              7 months ago

              While yes, a socialist country would have other priorities but let’s also not forget that the USSR wasn’t socialist. Before Stalin it had the potential to be sometime in the future but that got sidelined at best.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                The USSR was a Worker State, it was Socialist. It was a highly flawed Socialist State in many ways, but it was still fundamentally Socialist.

                On what grounds do you believe the USSR was not Socialist? We can certainly debate effectiveness, but I haven’t seen a genuine Marxist argument for why the USSR wasn’t Socialist.

                • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Workers had no control over the means of production. Those were owned by the party which was just another form of bourgeoisie rule. A good example of that was the insane amount of nepotism in the party leading to appointment of friends and relatives with no competency who went against the wishes of the workers. Trofim Lysenko for example was appointed by Stalin and his policies forced farmers to basically kill their crops leading to mass famines in the USSR and those that didn’t were declared fascists, traitors or something along those lines.

                  It’s not socialist if the workers lack any control.

      • Marketsupreme@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Don’t blame end-consumer offloading on me. I do my best, but Taylor Swift gets to fly her jet to run errands.