Hiya, so am looking to buy more storage and while browsing am seeing some external harddisks, such as Western Digital My Book and Seagate Expansion Desktop for cheaper than the internal harddisks themselves. Have seen this one video from KTZ Systems where he bought up multiple of these external ones just to open them up and use the disks for his own server. Was therefore wondering if you peeps have ever done this and if there any downsides to it at all?

  • TheHolm@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 months ago

    Why create yourself a headache and still get substandard and no-warranty drive. If you want cheaper drives go for reconditioned/refurbished/used drives. Same risks, better product. Old enterprise SAS drives are cheap and many still have plenty of heath in them.

  • lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is what I did when I had to refurb a laptop. Swap the drives, reinstall the OS, snd hand it all to the user. All your files are on this usb drive.

    Thats when you find out who understands folder structure and who doesn’t.

    • Phoonzang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      I guess it shows how out of touch (old) I am that it’s completely bewildering to me that there could be people who do not understand folders … on a computer. Phones, tablets, yeah, I get that, those actively make it harder and harder to access the folder structure. But computers?

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Not specifically, no. When I did change to building my own NAS, I cracked open my older 4TB backup drive to use as a spare.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yes. Be aware there will be some pin blocking you need to do to make it work right because vendors know this trick.

    • stevestevesteve@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I have done this with dozens of drives and have never had to do any pin blocking. You only need to do that if you’re using an absolutely ancient sata power cable that doesn’t know about the spinup pin change

        • stevestevesteve@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          This has been the case since SATA revision 3.3, released Feb 2016. So while I may have exaggerated with “ancient”, a brand new PSU certainly shouldn’t still be feeding 3.3v to that pin.

        • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Same here. A brand new modular Seasonic Platinum PSU (back in 2018 when I built the PC) also needed the 3v3 pin covered. I just use Kapton tape over the pin to avoid any destructive methods or having to use sketchy molex connectors.

  • MstrDialUp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yup. And if you want to look up more info on how to do it correctly, look up hard drive shucking.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Just that those ext disk aren’t built for 24/7 usage. They will die faster and generate bigger costs over time 😉

      • Bizarroland@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        If you look around and are informed then you can easily purchase drives that are designed for Nas use. I shucked three eight terabyte Western digital external hard drives and they were all WD reds, but because of the deal they were running they were $60 a piece cheaper inside of the shell than they were outside of the shell.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        My oldest ones have been running 24/7 since 2018 and tons of people have been doing the same. Where’s your data to suggest that these drives fail faster than any other?

    • xavier666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Don’t you think it’s wild that a hard drive, which is just chilling inside its case, suddenly has its innards spilled out using a screwdriver, and dumped into a 24/7 NAS with other hard disks.

      A bit inhumane if you ask me.

  • youmaynotknow@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Indeed. That’s how I populated my NAS with 3 10TB drives and saved around 120 dollars total, and this was 4 years ago.

    These are the ones I got: https://a.co/d/8x58jBY

    The only extra thing was disabling the 3v pin, and that was it. Been running rock solid all this time.

    Just make sure to research what disks are in the external housings you’re planning on getting, as not all drives need to have pins removed/covered.

  • MonkderDritte@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I did once. Well, more along the lines of “what did i buy this thing for, can use the HDD as is”. The HDD had additional contact points at the bottom. Don’t remember if they worked as is and what i did with them.

  • infinitevalence@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    many times, shucking is a very valid way to get large format disks for cheaper than retail NAS parts. But be aware of what your buying and make sure that the disk your getting if its a white label is a reliable disk. WD Easystore/Mybook are generally good, as are the larger format Seagate external.

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yes and i got “scammed” - western digital in order to save $3 included the USB port directly on the drive motherboard instead of the usual sata+usb like anyone else was doing

  • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    IMO, if you want the beast deals right now on a 12+ TB HDD, you should use serverpartdeals.com instead. I’ve got 2 manufacturer recertified 14 TB enterprise-grade drives from them and it was way cheaper than buying any 14 TB external drive.

      • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Not the person you replied to, but my first 9 HDDs were all shucked from external WD enclosures (MyBook, Elements, EasyStore), but the last one I bought used from serverpartdeals.com. I think it was about $120 for a 14TB WD server drive. Thus far all is well with it after about a year.

  • klangcola@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    You might want to look up SMR vs CMR, and why it matters for NASes. The gist is that cheaper drives are SMR, which work fine mostly, but can time out during certain operations, like a ZFS rebuild after a drive failure.

    Sorry don’t remember the details, just the conclusion that’s it’s safer to stay away from SMR for any kind of software RAID

    EDIT: also, there was the SMR scandal a few years ago where WD quietly changed their bigger volume WD Red (“NAS”) drives to SMR without mentioning it anywhere in the speccs. Obviously a lot of people were not happy to find that their “NAS” branded hard drives were made with a technology that was not suitable for NAS workload. From memory i think it was discovered when someone investigated why their ZFS rebuild kept failing on their new drive.

    • ares35@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      i bought a few smr drives, knowing they were smr. they were cheaper, a lot cheaper than the same amount of space in cmr. used only for static media storage, so that’s not a big deal, really., but holy hell was it slow getting stuff on them initially.

      i have a few self-powered externals that are also smr (quite common with those as they use 2.5in notebook hdd). when those things have to start shuffling bits around and rewriting tracks, sustained write speeds fall well under what even usb2 can send.

      • blackstrat@lemmy.fwgx.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Pretty sure my Seagate usb disks I use for backup are SMR and sustained writes are awfully slow. Luckily I’ve discovered restic for backing up which lowered a 1.5tb weekly incremental backup from 9hrs to 1 min.