• Ms. ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Hottest I’ve ever been in is 114f iirc in a dry heat. It was brutal like “you can feel moisture evaporating out of your eyes”, I felt like just sitting around I couldn’t drink water as fast as I was losing it. 125 is bonkers

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 month ago

    50C is near OSHA’s max limit to touch safe zones which is 60C. At 60C, no matter how many seconds, you will get burnt. At 50C you can hold an object for a few seconds safely.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      But also keep in mind that it’s usually air temperature being measured, with surface temperatures being even worse than that!

      • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        You know how 0C is far from 60C but you can easily experience 0C in a winter? Well check it out, 50C is closer to 60C by about 50C difference from 0C. This 50C tends to be near 60C when compared to 0C and really 49 other whole numbers of degrees Celsius! An infinity of numbers if you add decimal places.

    • systemglitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m with you, but it’s not the SUVs that are causing the problem, it’s the fucking corporations that contribute over 80% of the harmful emissions.

      But fuck SUVs and big ass trucks.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        it’s not the SUVs that are causing the problem, it’s the fucking corporations

        The corporations are the ones that block mass transit infrastructure and extract subsidies for increasingly oversized vehicles. American car companies basically don’t bother making sedans anymore.

        I don’t think there’s a bright line between the two problems. More SUVs = Corporate profit $$$ = More lobbying = No Mass Transit = More SUVs

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        What do this corporations do to cause 80% of emissions? Just burn it for fun?

        No. They make products and services that people buy. Making out people play no part in this doesn’t help anyone.

        • StaySquared@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I find it fascinated… one side of their mouth, they’re hating corporations. Other side, they’re praising the product(s) they buy from said corporations. If any of these so called, “combatants of climate change” were true to their beliefs, they’d go find a piece of wilderness and live in it.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Just burn it for fun?

          The degree to which businesses prioritize political patronage over economic efficiency can’t be overstated. From Shitcoins to Big Box Retailers, we expend enormous amounts of carbon in pursuit of flights of fancy.

          And all those private jets and helicopters out to remote ecologically preserved vacation spots could definitely be defined as “burning fossil fuels for fun”.

        • kat_angstrom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s not just “they make products and services that people buy”, it’s that “they maximize their personal profit at the expense of people and the environment”.

          It’s easy but reductive to blame consumers for consuming, when it’s worth noting that biodegradable packaging costs more than plastics that will never break down, so corporations will choose cheap plastic over environmentally friendly packaging 99.9% of the time.

          The incentives are wrong. Instead of maximizing profit we need to ensure that profit is not maximized at the expense of sustainability, at the expense of pollution, and at the expense of the entire future of our planet.

          • Wanderer@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            That’s a government issue.

            E.g. a carbon tax will solve a lot of problems, or a tax on waste like plastic. It is very very unpopular with the public though so the government can’t put it in place for fear of being voted out.

            • kat_angstrom@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              That’s… Really passing the buck though.

              Nothing is stopping corporations from doing The Right Thing right now except their own desire not for profit, but for maximized profit at all costs. Dare I say it, but if a company can’t make a profit without creating harm, it doesn’t deserve to make a profit.

              • Wanderer@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                The us government has said corporations are legally required to maximise profit for the shareholders.

                Again government issue.

      • blazera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        I start to wonder if corporate executives themselves arent responsible for this myth that the meaningful bulk of emissions comes from them. So consumers can feel guilt free about buying these gas guzzling chunkers, after all their choices dont have any meaningful effect on emissions.

        But no, corporate headquarters doesnt have a giant smokestack spewing out those corporate emissions you hear about. Those emissions are coming from…SUV tailpipes! Transportation is the highest emissions sector in the US, and personal vehicles make up the bulk of those emissions, especially trucks and SUVs.

    • AmosBurton_ThatGuy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Jesus. Anything over 20c is too much for me. I can’t even fathom what 50c feels like and I hope I never have to experience that.

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        We adapt. Whenever I have my relatives from Brazil visiting, they’re always wearing coats indoors while I’m wearing short sleeves and shorts. A few years ago, I endured 40-45 C summers.

        • Veneroso@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Pretty sure that this is close to unlivable.

          The world will adapt.

          Especially when it’s rid of the pesky parasites running around and ruining everything.

          Us.

            • Veneroso@lemmy.world
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              Gotcha. Yeah, there’s a lot of concern over refugees migrating now. Wait a summer or two with these types of temperatures, and countries won’t be able to build fences high enough.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 month ago

        20 is my good spot too, like 24 and I’m dying. We had a heat wave in BC, Canada last couple of yeara and it hit 38-40 most days during the 2 weeks. The amount of sweating and fatique were exhausting. 52 would have killed me.

      • Aux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        +20 is too cold for me personally, I prefer +25 to +30. And I’m originally from Northern parts of Europe.

  • urska@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    We need these engineers and doctors in Europe and English speaking countries asap.

  • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Oh… if only the scientists had warned us something like this could happen…

    Oh… wait…

    Well, if only the scientists had done something bigger and been louder to get everyone’s attention, like saying global warming is bad and self-immolating in a public place to try to warn people we’re all about to die…

    Oh… wait…

    Well, don’t worry, the magic sky gods will all take us to paradise once it gets too hot, and they lived happily ever after, the end, Yay! 🎈 🎉

  • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    1 month ago

    Don’t worry Pakistan Greenpeace banned nuclear power and brought back coal, that will save you from the ravages of global warming

  • CptEnder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Genuinely curious. Is it safer to stay inside without AC or go outside in shade? Isn’t the ambient air temperature still too dangerous in the shade?

    Anyway whoever starts selling AC to Europe is going to print money.

      • Jomn@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ve never had AC at home, and that’s also the case for most people I know. I live in the south of France.

          • Jomn@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 month ago

            Meh, if your house is built correctly, it is not needed. And you also get used to it.

            I just use a fan during the night, which does the job without having to use so much electricity.

      • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        Depends on the country. A few years ago, there was a heat wave that provoked over 10 deaths in France, while Spain barely registered any despite suffering even harsher temperatures. This is because most homes in Spain have AC, but French ones usually don’t. I would expect this to change in the following decade.

      • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        Only in public buildings. We never needed AC with out relatively mild temperature, good insulation and it was seen as a waste of electricity.

      • Seven@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        In southern parts of Europe maybe. But in Germany for example they are really rare.

      • CptEnder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I lived in Paris and no one had it besides commercial buildings. But with climate change causing higher temperatures across the region, I think AC modifications of some sort will become the norm. My friend in Spain recently got AC after one summer he had to stay with his friend in Denmark because his house became unlivable. Like it would’ve killed his cat it was so hot inside.

    • PiousAgnostic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      I lived in Phoenix Arizona where 52 C was the peak of the summer heat. I’m not sure how one would have a regular life without AC. Sleeping in that type of heat is very hard.

      I had a truck with no AC and driving around with the windows open was like opening a convection oven door and letting the fan blow on you.

    • sushibowl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Is it safer to stay inside without AC or go outside in shade? Isn’t the ambient air temperature still too dangerous in the shade?

      Humidity is a big factor, if humidity is low then evaporative cooling (e.g. sweating) is quite effective. Even more so in a breeze.

      • CptEnder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ahhh yeah good point. So somewhere like Pakistan probably has low humidity I’m guessing. Otherwise I feel like being outside at all could be extremely dangerous.

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Heck.i work in those temps for 12 hours a pop. Couldnt stand it 24 hrs a day

  • palmtrees2308@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Hats off to delivery people, soldiers, guards, roadside sellers for not dying in this heat apocalypse

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 month ago

    Welcome to Pakistan, we have:

    • drunken COAS with nukes
    • smog
    • the hot
    • fresh fruit