Feedback welcome! Here’s the TL;DR list

  1. Listen more to more Black people
  2. Post less – and think before you post
  3. Call in, call out, and/or report anti-Blackness when you see it
  4. Support Black people and Black-led instances and projects

Other suggestions?

  • verstra@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is all hard to do because it is hard to determine people’s race on lemmy. Some usernames give it away but most don’t. And I don’t go snooping trough their post history to find that out.

    • The Nexus of Privacy@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, the section on “Listen more to Black people” didn’t really cover the challenges on Lemmy. I added this:

      If you’re on a platform like Lemmy which doesn’t yet have similar hubs, it’s more challenging. One option is to use other social networks, news aggregators, and search engines to find articles, papers, and videos by Black people – and post them yourself to help others listen.

      How’s that?

  • Lime Buzz@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Other suggestions:

    Social problems cannot be solved by technical solutions e.g. “turning the racism off” by filtering or blocking others as a user (run from any instance that takes this approach instead of defederating or blocking at an instance level).

    If your instance is shit and gets blocked, don’t complain that it got blocked, either complain to the admins of the shit instance or move instances.

    Boost the things they say about their experiences or the experiences of others and boost things they care about because likely it’ll benefit people at the very least by raising awareness.

    • The Nexus of Privacy@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Thanks, all good points, I’ll try to work them in! The boosting is somewhat tricky, the general guideline is “boost posts tht people want boosted, don’t boost posts that they don’t want boosted”, but it’s not always clear which is which (unless they. have “Please boost” in there somewhere)

      • Lime Buzz@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Another good point is as white people we have a responsibility to figure out if racists can see a boost. In that case we need to figure out a way to stop that harm immediately either by removing certain followers or blocking/reporting etc.

  • Shadow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Oh look, it’s another old white guy trying to solve a problem he’s not affected by and probably hasn’t personally experienced.

    Edit: Sorry that was so negative, but these are all pretty basic things you’re stating. Anyone likely to read this list and action items like this, is likely already staunchly pro black.

    Would be good to see some more items that would make people do a double take and say “oh, I do that, I didn’t realize that could be construed as anti black”. Use your experience as a non black person to try and identify ways that a white person might be impacting black people unintentionally.

    • The Nexus of Privacy@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      These things are basic, but most white people aren’t doing them – even people who think of themselves as staunchly pro Black. And there are multiple examples in the article of how white people might be impacting Black people unintentionally, for example thisiswomanswerk talks about how hand-wringing messages of symptay many times are themselves microaggresive, and suggestions like “Stop asking Black people for evidence of the anti-Blackness” and “Stop telling Black people that they’ll experience less racism if they change instances (aka servers)”

    • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      5 months ago

      In the context, the author isn’t saying “you should reduce your whole Fediverse activity”. It’s more like “when talking about this stuff, if you aren’t black, think before you say something. And you probably don’t need to say it, it’s better to shut up”.

      It’s sensible advice even if worded poorly.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    5 months ago

    Some of the replies here are a bit disheartening, reflexively dismissing this list, the need for it, and the validity of the experiences behind it.

    • Lime Buzz@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It’s unsurprising, sadly. Folks are stuck in their bubbles often and don’t see the harm they cause.

      They wrap it up in fancy words or reasoning sadly, but the reasons are always the same basically: They don’t want to do the work.

    • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      You don’t have to play rap music and apologize for slavery to make them feel welcome.

      i’ll preserve this quote for people who disagree that the OP’s post is needed, or who think there isn’t racism on the Fediverse. it’s insane how many of you are demonstrating the point.

  • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    5 months ago

    Per item 2, I don’t think that the overall reduction of posting is good, especially on a platform as starved for content like Lemmy. Why should the overall amount of content drop off if there is room for posts created by people of color to be shown here?

  • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’m not sure posting less is good for the fediverse in the long run, but thinking more is certainly needed! Good list

    • TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Hi Tomato - a lot of what you’re saying here has already been addressed elsewhere in the thread. The OP isn’t just addressing Lemmy, but other Fediverse services like Mastodon as well. He also notes in the article several people who been addressing ways in which Fediverse culture has been toxic to black users. These aren’t imagined problems, they exist in a lot of places off of and on Lemmy, and providing suggestions to make these sites better for black users is a good thing, not something to get defensive about. This post isn’t accusing you personally of anything, but if you feel challenged by it then it might be a good opportunity for you to interrogate those feelings.

      Also, others have addressed your comments about not seeing other’s race online, etc, but I think it’s worth taking a step back and pausing. If people of color say they experience racism online, even though you don’t notice what race other people are, do you think it’s possible that there may be systemic problems or unconscious biases that might cause those folks to experience racism even when it is unintended? Those are the kinds of problems that aren’t solved by saying “I don’t say racist things to people and I don’t see color”. They’re problems that are built into our society just by the fact that we were all born and raised in an imperfect culture.

      Nobody is accusing anyone of anything here, and nobody is trying to make anyone feel ashamed of who they are. But we can all benefit from stopping, thinking about the ways that we interact with others, and taking the time to try and be sure that we aren’t acting in ways that harm others even if that isn’t our intent or we weren’t aware of the harm in the first place.

    • TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      Also, tomato, “people are trying to make you ashamed of being white” is a pretty common white supremacist dogwhistle. I’m sure that’s not how you intended it, but I think you’d be better served avoiding it in the future.

    • Gaywallet (they/it)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      I just want to say that @TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org did a great job explaining some of the issues with your reply, but there’s a few things that I want to focus on in your reply.

      • It’s easy to make the claim that you don’t care about skin color, but it simply doesn’t pan out. Here’s a fairly long but comprehensive review on implicit bias training, which talks a bit about the prevalence and need for the training in the first place. In short, the literature proves that everyone has implicit biases - it’s simply how our brains work. While some issues suffer from stronger biases than others, and the bias varies from person to person, it’s always there.
      • The idea of “not seeing” race may be an appealing one to state, but it’s an over-correction. Try telling someone in a wheelchair that you “don’t see disability” and see how they react. They’re not going to be happy. You absolutely see their identity. What you mean to say is that their identity doesn’t factor into your decision, which as I just stated in the last point is objectively incorrect. At best we can work to minimize how one’s identity shapes our decisions.
      • Racism can only have certain victims. Racism is the interaction between prejudice and power. The reason it’s defined like this is the same reason we talk about the paradox of tolerance. Punching a Nazi is technically violence, but there’s a difference between hateful violence and defensive violence. While you can classify people being prejudiced against white folks as racism, there’s a similar distinction between prejudice and racism that applies here. To be clear, I do want you to be reporting any kind of prejudice that occurs on Beehaw, but we need to define and describe the differences because the inclusion of power and minority status are important here.
      • Just because you don’t think something is a problem doesn’t mean it’s not a problem. Someone who has a different identity than you, or who spends time in spaces you don’t is sharing something. Telling them they are wrong or that they are imagining things is not a nice thing to do - if you don’t think it’s an issue, then don’t reply. If you do think it’s an issue, frame it differently - rather than accusing them of trying to shame white people, how about simply framing things through your own eyes. Don’t say that they are trying to shame people, instead say this is making you feel ashamed or angry.
  • Kwakigra@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    5 months ago

    OP, from this reception you may feel at least a little misunderstood. This is because you are being deliberately misunderstood because whiteness protects itself. Notice that no one commenting thus far has responded to you in good faith, but have only been dismissive or even reject the premise that this even could be a problem outright.

    Whiteness is interested in terminating any curiosity that challenges white supremacy. Exclusive white habitus is the expectation of those who identify with whiteness, and deviation is actively resisted. If white people didn’t do this there literally wouldn’t be white people and racism would be over. It persists because the people who maintain it are cultured to protect it by any means, especially by rejecting all challenges to it outside of an historical context.

    The reason I say all this is because I’ve attempted the same conversation you are attempting now and this has been what’s happened every single time. You can’t have a good faith conversation with anyone answering in bad faith. I think this effort is worthwhile and support it, but I advise not to waste too much time with anyone here who is more interesting in refuting you than the problem of racism.