I tried to delete and recreate the container, but there’s still this insane power consumption.

For comparison, cloudflared doing a tunnel to hundreds of users takes 0.06% of CPU time on the same server

  • redcalcium@c.calciumlabs.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    On my machine it’s consuming about 0.5% - 1.0% of cpu time, which is higher than zerotier in the same machine (almost zero).

    Tailscale does a lot more things than just tunneling though. For example, on default installation it’ll catch all outbound dns request on the machine and route them through MagicDNS (100.100.100.100).

    • Moonrise2473@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s weird. I closed the docker on that specific machine (ryzen 5), copied the docker-compose directory (=same config) on an i5-6500T and now it’s using just 0.1% of CPU time.

      Go back to ryzen and it’s 8% again 🤷

      • redcalcium@c.calciumlabs.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I just checked my AMD box and tailscale there can consume ~15% of cpu time when the tunnel is under active use. When it’s not used it’s ~1.5%. But it’s a low power old AMD cpu though (AMD G-T56N), so I’m not use if it compares to Ryzen 5. On my intel machine, it’s ~5% when under active use, and idle at ~0.5%.

      • baduhai@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I use tailscale on my Ryzen system, and it always stays under 1% usage. Usually below 0.5%.

      • HousePanther@lemmy.goblackcat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        One thing you could try doing if you feel up to it is to build Tailscale from source code. Often when built for your specific machine, performance improves.

    • Moonrise2473@feddit.itOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because that’s a docker container on a “busy” server (mostly WordPress wasting cycles generating pages for some bots that really have to visit my blog over and over and over and over)

      (Top from inside the container)

      • StefanAmaris@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        you might want to look into getting wordpress to generate static pages and only deliver the static html.

        Overall using bloging tools that generate static pages is better than constantly requesting DB and dynamically compiling each page every time there is a request

        • Moonrise2473@feddit.itOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah it’s a long time that I wanted to migrate to Hugo

          The main issue is that a decade ago or so, I hosted a vibrant forum with the stupidest platform ever, bbpress. So my WordPress has something like 30k pages…