cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/2724505

Archived link

Russia’s naval activity near undersea cables is reportedly drawing the scrutiny of US officials, further sparking concerns that the Kremlin may be plotting to “sabotage” underwater infrastructure via a secretive, dedicated military unit called the General Staff Main Directorate for Deep Sea Research (GUGI).

[…]

Knocking out internet and telecommunications traffic traveling across these fiber-optic cables would have a devastating effect on government, military, and private-sector communications.

More than 95 percent of international data flows through those submarine cables, which puts them at increasing risk of both cyber and physical attacks .

[…]

Last year, public broadcasters of Sweden, Denmark, Norway, and Finland uncovered a Russian fleet of suspected spy ships operating in Nordic waters, reportedly for purposes of sabotaging both submarine cables and wind farms.

**In addition to communications, the cables also carry electricity between European countries. **

[…]

“Any activities that damaged seabed infrastructure including undersea cables especially during periods of heightened tensions risks misunderstandings and misperceptions that could lead to unintended escalation,” [said an] US official. “The US would be especially concerned about damage to our or our allies’ critical undersea infrastructure.”

    • The Doctor@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 months ago

      A few of us have a long-running joke that World War III will be started because somebody can’t reach Pornhub anymore.

    • JayTreeman@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      If I was running a country and preparing to cut cables like that, it would be because I’d infected the enemy with some type of virus that when activated would wreak havoc over their internet. I’d cut the cables immediately before activation. However, I might be smarter than the Russian leadership, and I don’t run a country.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        But still yes, once NATO works out which Russian stuff to take out in response.

        Probably the ghost tankers, right?

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            If it’s outside Russia, sure. It’s probably going to be something (or some things) in international space if it’s a retaliation for something in international space. Or at least, it should be, because I don’t really buy the “direct war with Russia would be fine” jerk.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I feel like the “tits” they would get for that “tat” would be pretty bad for them. NATO breaks toys better than they ever will.

    I don’t really think it would start WWIII on it’s own, though.

  • stallmer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    If history is any guide, the Russian subs shouldn’t have any problem getting down to the cables.