Summary

Elon Musk has called on King Charles III to dissolve the UK Parliament, citing past controversies involving Prime Minister Keir Starmer and the Rotherham Scandal.

Musk accused Starmer of inaction during his tenure as head of the Crown Prosecution Service and urged a new general election, drawing backlash for spreading misinformation.

Critics argue that the monarchy lacks the unilateral power to dissolve Parliament under the 2022 Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act.

Musk’s growing political involvement globally, including support for right-wing parties, has sparked calls for regulation against foreign interference.

  • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    6 days ago

    As a Brit I think Elon Musk should fuck off meddling in ours and other countries politics.

    I also think that King Charles should dissolve the monarchy as it’s sickening to have such a thing in 2025.

    People often say but tourism. The fact is France gets many more visitors a year than Britain and they got rid of their monarchy. We could make more turning Buckingham Palace into a bougie hotel for instance.

  • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    153
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Critics argue that the monarchy lacks the unilateral power to dissolve Parliament under the 2022 Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act.

    Is that what “critics” argue about?
    How about the massive South African white elephant in the room:

    Why the fuck should Charles even acknowledge Musk’s noises?

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      57
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      They’re manufacturing consent for the plutocracy — that has always owned politics — instead of doing what one would expect in a democracy… bringing in a psychiatrist to explain the mental illness indicators Musk is very obviously displaying.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if he has a brain tumor. He’s obviously fucked in the head in many more ways than one, and none of them are “normal”.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Too much money, like Michael Jackson and so many others.

        Boatloads of drugs and yesmen too.

        • droporain@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          You can’t blame the drugs lots of high people not interfering with another countries government calling for fascism.

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            7 days ago

            Well do the usual drug enjoyer have the possibility to interfere in foreign politics?

            • droporain@lemmynsfw.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              I’m pretty sure you’d be surprised about the “adults” you wouldn’t think who are out there enjoying drugs.

      • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        He’s obviously fucked in the head in many more ways than one

        Aren’t all leaders?

        For politicians, it takes a particular mindset to think you’re the solution to other people’s problems and run for any election. I instantly distrust people who thrust themselves in the limelight and propose to rule others for their own good.

        As for CEO’s, it’s very well known that a disturbing percentage of them display psychopathic traits.

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    7 days ago

    I mean, if the king really wants to become beloved of the people he should indeed make a visit to parliament, and request they dissolve Musk’s UK holdings.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Well, he has sausage fingers, but he can still do something like what Mummy likely would have done if some South African upstart tried to tell her what to do:

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    7 days ago

    I was going to make a joke about how King Charles should dissolve Elon in a vat of acid, but I’m not sure if that’s comes off as promoting violence in our current climate of oligarchicide.

    • BougieBirdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 days ago

      Since this is advice given to a monarch by a person who otherwise has no impact on the rich and powerful, I’d argue you could call this a case of Jester’s Privilege

      We should bring that back. If nothing I do matters, then nothing I say matters, right?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      It would definitely be skirting the line of what we would moderate, but I think we’d probably let it go just because it’s a comic book villain ending rather than saying “shoot him in the head” or whatever.

      Plus, it would obviously be a joke.

      Edit: all I can picture is this, but with Elon’s face on it.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    So, technically, the monarchy signed over the majority of executive power to Parliament with the Parliament Act 1911 which gives authority over taxation and budgets to Parliament.

    But bills do also technically still require Royal Assent, which has not been withheld since 1708.

    So… the Crown COULD try to force an impasse where nothing can pass without their approval, but then Parliament COULD make the Crown live off canned beans.

  • Not a replicant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Can someone get Lord Sugar drunk and have him express a similar view about the US?

    “err, hic the unites, uniting, united states should separism, seapar, separate the head of state role from the, ,uhh, head of government. They can have gonger, er, congress appoint a cereminimum, er ceremonial head of state with reserve powers to dissolve congress… burp

    • then_three_more@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 days ago

      without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.

      He’d just buy enough congress people to get it passed.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      I doubt that would work.

      All Trump would do would be to make his post an unpaid advisory one and then he’d get to insist people call him Sir Elon.

      It’s not like he needs the paycheck or the benefits and he would love the ego boost.

      • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Or he’d just do exactly the same as he was going to do anyway, it’s not like anyone stopped him hiring his own family members in blatant disregard for the law, why would this be any different?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Very true. I keep saying the same thing about other things and I should have realized this applies as well.