Then don’t use Chrome?

I’ve never seen any good content coming from that instance. Only political bullshit and fighting.

Why does that instance still exist? Wow.

The difference between the services in the image and Lemmy is …

THIS would be Lemmy:

And two networks and a reverse proxy and four more volumes …

If captchas are easily solveable by bots what is their point then?

It’s absurdly complex and annoying and lacks proper documentation.

There currently is no sane way to deploy it via docker since it needs half a dozen of different containers and volumes and networks to barely work at all - overwriting/ruining your already existing setup while doing so.

The cleanest would likely be setting up a VM where you set up docker in and let Lemmy do whatever it wants.

Bard 2.0 is as removed as the original one.

That is correct. Your instance needs to defederate from the other instance to also block comments/users.

User-based instance blocking is actually just hiding posts from that instance. It does not hide or block comments made from users of that instance on posts that are not coming from that instance.

“It’s my favorite clothes brand!”

Oh no. Anyways …

This looks like the place where uncle Bob makes his temporary blindness potion.

Not because I can’t afford it but because I don’t accept it!

… and it is not even an interesting franchise.

Your dinner is for free if you don’t eat anything for dinner!

The old age of the Docker image is a bit of a red flag to me.

I settled with SWS since the Docker image and a locally installable version are actively maintained by the creator. It just serves static files and optionally directory listing as JSON (which comes in quite handy).

I still don’t get what you’re trying to say.

Do not let people use your OS account if you don’t want them to have access to all of your data, including all of your browser profiles.

Browser profiles are not a security feature.

Yes, they do. I use 4 different browser profiles for various things. But everyone who uses my computer while I cannot control what they do, gets their own user account or can use a guest account.

When it comes to HTTPS, this is just plain wrong on a technical level.