• 0 Posts
  • 11 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 4th, 2024

help-circle

  • Sc00ter@lemm.eetoMemes@lemmy.mlAI bros
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    This was our company too. They struck some sort of deal with chat gpt that we use their base code, but aren’t connected to their machine learning. Feels like a pretty reasonable approach in my opinion.

    So our training was, “use ours. Don’t use anyone else’s because we don’t want our proprietary information out there to never be able to be scrubbed from the internet”







  • Sc00ter@lemm.eetoMemes@lemmy.mlYou ain't fooling anyone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Some office work too though. If you want to actually win the contracts, you gotta go fast. Granted, it’s not fast all the time, and we can plan when those contracta sprints are coming, to an extent, but I would definitely describe my office job as fast paced.

    Not to mention when the customer changes the statement of work you’re bidding on…




  • Yeah pretty sure that’s a war crime under the Rome Statute. Emphasis mine.

    The law applicable in international armed conflict forbids “mak[ing] improper use of … the military insignia and uniform of the enemy …” (Art. 23(f) of the Hague Regulations of 1899 and 1907; Art. 39 of Additional Protocol I; Art. 8(2)(b)(vii) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court). Not all uses of enemy uniforms are prohibited therefore; only “improper” uses. For example, wearing enemy uniforms in order to flee the fighting or escape capture does not run afoul of the law (U.S. Department of Defense Law of War Manual § 5.23.1.4). On the other side of the spectrum, engaging in attacks while wearing the uniform of the enemy is flatly prohibited, as affirmed in the treaty law and numerous military manuals (see here, here and here, for example), and is a war crime under the Rome Statute.