Seems like we’re all in agreement that all information should be free, I look forward to them open-sourcing every proprietary bit of code they have
Seems like we’re all in agreement that all information should be free, I look forward to them open-sourcing every proprietary bit of code they have
Mutation testing is a cool concept, but what’s it got to do with the fediverse?
It’s got a great safety feature in that nobody understands it enough to attempt driving fast enough to cause a crash
This one? Noted!
I do have a Logitech mouse and as far as I’m aware all the buttons are customisable (through their questionable program), so hopefully this is just marketing nonsense
Dedicated AI button: ✋😒
Dedicated change-LED-colour button: 👈😯
Yeah but seeing actual proof is always important
Albania is the coolest, Ivano-Frankivsk is the most fun
A bit of that, but hopefully if they piss off too many people they’ll just go elsewhere
Isn’t the real use case just so they don’t have to waste staff time changing labels manually when stock changes or moves?
Yeah I do. They still want to be able to sell their premium subscriptions and not every engineer working on the product is some soulless corpo. If they can break all adblockers without damaging their product they will, but if it fucks things up too much then they’ll go back to the drawing board and try something else.
Hopefully they’ll realise it’s a bigger breaking change than they wanted as part of this testing phase
If Google can do that then hopefully sponsor block can too!
TL;DW: the ads will be in the video stream itself which will mess up timestamps, sponsor block uses timestamps to know when the ads are.
Seems to me that this will also break every other use case of specific times like direct linking to a timestamp of a video, right?
This is an ancient chain-letter-email, and while a little bit true isn’t quite that simple
A more optimistic way of looking at it is that this tool makes people more interested in alt-text in general, meaning more tools are developed to make use of it, meaning more web devs bother with it in the first place (either using this tool or manually)
Reads to me like “oh no, our automated verification is perfect, there was just one rogue human who has been punished/corrected/re-educated so there’s no way this could ever happen again, case closed”
Probably not, but more concise than “amount of interest piqued”
If this is actually possible then isn’t that a huge security vulnerability in Android and/or iOS? I feel if this was the case we’d be hearing about it from security researchers rather than a lawyer.