• Allero@lemmy.today
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    It’s just a general assertion that if you let a person in your country, you treat them as anyone else.

    Besides, those athletes have done nothing wrong except being born in a country whose leadership decided to go full bloody. They need those performances for their professional career, and that’s why they went there anyway.

    Being horrified by the war doesn’t mean being hostile to the Olympic team. I, for one, am full pro-Palestine in a war, but fail to see why we should transform it into hostility towards Israeli athletes. Same with many people in France, I assume.

    It is debatable whether Israel should have been allowed; on one side, not letting them in would be a political sign, on the other, it could radicalize people and cut the ties that were in place to promote peace of all things.

    But athletes themselves did nothing wrong unless personally endorsing the genocide, and shouldn’t be treated like unwelcome invaders.

    And there’s no point comparing it to the death toll of Palestinians; two wrongs don’t make a right. Sure, conflict in Gaza is a much more urgent and serious problem, but that doesn’t mean hostility against Israeli athletes should be ignored.

    • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s not a war; it’s a genocide.
      And Israel’s crimes don’t stop there.

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Doesn’t really make a difference in what I say.

        To me, a war can be genocidal, and this one is. And peace times can have apartheid, which has also taken place.

        • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          It does make a bit of difference. There’s only one side you can be on in a genocide.
          Any country committing a genocide should have all of its privileges taken away. One example of this is having its athletes compete in the Olympics.

          • Allero@lemmy.today
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Any country committing genocide should be stopped from being able to commit it. That means putting meaningful sanctions that impact military complex and, when possible, directly confronting the force on the battlefield.

            Not restricting athletes who have nothing to do with this from competing.

            People seemingly forget that a country is not a singular entity or a hive mind. Actual people live there, and those who do not endorse violence shouldn’t face struggles and consequences because of those who do - at least to a practical degree. Punishing athletes for the actions of Israeli command is picking a wrong target.

            • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Not in the slightest. I’m aware that a country isn’t a monolith. Unfortunately, the country as a whole celebrates its victories in sporting events. These athletes shouldn’t be punished, true. But the politicians who are committing genocide should. Their ability to celebrate their nation and to receive international acclaim is unfortunately tied up in their athlete’s careers.
              Allowing Israel to participate is validating a genocidal apartheid ethnostate. The athletes wear that flag.