• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        62
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        He doesnt like being called a disgusting freak for slaughtering whales, letting them slowly die after dragging them on land to maximize their suffering. Thats the only reason i can think of for why a faroe national would be mad at him.

        I dont like him either, but this level of hatred only comes from people who got caught in the act and dont want anyone to talk about it.

        • sandbox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          31
          ·
          5 months ago

          As long as you’re vegan or happy with being called a disgusting freak for eating animal products I think that’s fine.

          • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            42
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            It’s not about being vegan or not in this case.

            The Faroe islands have a traditional whale/dolphin (I don’t remember which exactly) slaughter every year.
            They drag dozens of them on beaches and kill them. It used to be one of their main food sources for the year, which is respectable.
            But nowadays they don’t need to do it anymore, yet carry on with this super cruel tradition.

            It’s a bit like bull runs and bull fighting, I get the traditional side of it, but it’s something that should not be performed anymore because of the suffering and cruelty it causes.

              • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                21
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                What’s not accurate about my comment?

                Faroese whaling is a century old tradition that used to be about survival and used whale parts for food and other things like light, fishing material, clothing, etc.

                Nowadays, we have replacements for pretty much all these things right ? Whale meat doesn’t seem to be widely consumed much anymore, it’s also dangerous because of mercury levels in the whales.

                Yet the Faroese kill around 700 whales a year, and in a pretty cruel fashion. They force the whales to beach themselves, have their spinal cord and a few major arteries severed and left to bleed out and die over the course of minutes.

                I’m all in for traditions but not for cruel and pointless ones.

                  • BestBouclettes@jlai.lu
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    26
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Well, then educate me and please share accurate information then.

                    My source is the Wikipedia page which is nicely sourced with plenty of Faroese references: Whaling in the Faroe Islands.

                    Unfortunately I can’t read Faroese, so maybe all that sourced information has been lost in translation ?

            • sandbox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              5 months ago

              You are capable of subsisting without the consumption of animal products, and I assume you choose not to do so. You know that animal agriculture causes suffering. You choose your taste preferences instead of choosing to reduce suffering.

              You don’t need to do it anymore, yet carry on with this super cruel tradition.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                5 months ago

                Please, go ahead, tell us about your grand plan of growing enough food on the Faroer. And then go ahead and tell other native populations all over the world to stop living off the land sustainably, and instead go in debt to buy HFCS from Nestle.

                • sandbox@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Hey so there’s this crazy thing called a “boat”, and you may not believe this, but it’s like a big truck which can go over water. And you can basically put whatever you want on it, so you can grow fruits and vegetables in Scotland, and then move them to the Faroe Islands.

                  They actually worked this one out a little while ago, and they’ve got these big buildings now just full of food, just shelves upon shelves with all kinds of foodstuffs. I know it sounds unbelievable, but here’s a photo of a supermarket on the Faroe Islands!

                  A photo of a supermarket on the Faroe Islands

                  Now, I know you might be thinking, “well, hang on, doesn’t having a big boat like that cause climate change?” and the answer is “yes, but waaaaay less than animal agriculture.”

                  You also mentioned something about Nestlé HFCS, which I’m happy to reassure you about - It’s pretty rare over here, it’s really more of an American thing. We do have sugary foods as well, of course, but less so. But you can just choose not to eat those - it’s not like it is in the US where they put it in everything. And they’re not putting HFCS into the raw fruits and vegetables that you’d use to make a plant-based meal.

                  But you know what? Even if there are people living off the land sustainably - as in, fully providing for themselves and their families in whatever way they can without actively farming animals - and we’re okay with that, it doesn’t justify those of us who don’t live in that way to consume animal products.

                  Hope this helps!

                  • barsoap@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    Even if there are people living off the land sustainably - as in, fully providing for themselves and their families in whatever way they can without actively farming animals - and we’re okay with that,

                    So you’re ok with what the Faroese are doing, got it. Wait no you want to stop them letting sheep graze the parts of the island which aren’t suitable for agriculture, and instead whale more.

                    it doesn’t justify those of us who don’t live in that way to consume animal products.

                    Go on, tell me more about how the Faroese are living. How much of their economy, do you think, is food production in one way or the other? How, do you think, is the whale hunt organised? Is it commodified?

                    Having looked at that data (I trust you already have since you sound so sure and knowledgeable) one could of course say “well they could stop exporting fish then they wouldn’t need to whale”. There’s something to that, and it would also mean that they couldn’t afford to import machinery any more, couldn’t afford gas any more, no textile imports, and with them again sitting in row boats in sheepswool clothing maybe they’d look “primitive” enough for your tastes to be allowed to whale, again.

                    Seriously WTF. “This reservation has a supermarket, that means they should not be allowed to hunt any more”. Are you hearing yourself. Read this.

            • LordGimp@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              Paul isn’t out harassing inuit communities. Do you know why? Because inuit communities practice ACTUAL sustenance hunting, not a tradition of slaughter dressed up as “culture”. Do not disgrace actual caretakers of the land to cover up your barbarism

            • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              So if Sea Shepherd’s attacks were all honest, there would be less vitriol?

              Does he lie in a specific way that implicates innocent people? (vs. lying in a way that garners broader attention and the attention is what drives the additional hate) Curious for some examples as someone low-information on the subject.

            • Saljid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              28
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              Still nothing WHAT they allegedly lied about, only what the effects of said pictures were.

              • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                12
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whaling_in_the_Faroe_Islands

                • been going on since the 9th century
                • Faroese cuisine is generally dominated by the use of animal products, as only about 2% of the 1,393 km2 of land on the islands is at all suitable for arable crops
                • a 2008 paper in Australian Archaeology said conservationists find Faroese whaling particularly offensive because it does not conform to traditional Western perspectives on “primitive” tribes
                • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  But, you see, I think my culture is superior so they should stop.

                  Anyway, who’s up for an ethically* slaughtered cow that I’ve raised in a box?

                  • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Wow I didn’t realize that cows were endangered. I also didn’t realize that we slaughtered cows by drowning them.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              "how dare you call us out for the horrific things we’re doing ". Like you don’t even pretend it’s fake.

              Hey, you don’t like people shitting on your country? How about you make them stop slaughtering whales for no fucking reason.

              Like, I’m sorry, am I supposed to feel bad that people are rightfully calling you out for that shit? Is your country not a modern, functioning society? Are you really incapable of shedding these pointless barbaric traditions, and would rather just cry about it when someone dares to call you out?

              Let me guess, “I refuse to discuss this with you” or whatever. Like you response to the other person.

              I’m beginning to think you have more at stake in this than just being from the same country. I’m from the US, dude, my country is shit and there’s a million things to criticize it for… And you can’t even admit the one thing your home is known for is barbaric

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Is your country not a modern, functioning society? Are you really incapable of shedding these pointless barbaric traditions, and would rather just cry about it when someone dares to call you out?

                Have you actually looked into the topic or are you simply assuming? The Faroese regulations on whaling are extensive, from what methods are allowed to beach the whales to how the killing is to be done so it’s quick.

                I’m from the US, dude

                Then you should really focus on the complete absence of any animal protection laws in the US, instead. The Faroese didn’t even blink when outlawing the traditional way to kill the whales in favour of spinal lancing, yes of course whales bleeding out in shallow bays is a gruesome sight. And they own that, while risking their lives driving the whales in small boats.

                Meanwhile, US consumers are safely isolated from the absolutely abhorrent conditions their food is produced under. The bloody bays aren’t avoidable, they come (literally) with the territory. Chicken rotting while still alive because they’re so tightly packed and hygiene isn’t an issue because you’re chlorinating them anyway is avoidable.

                It’s you, here, who’s alienated from how food is produced, not the Faroese.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        Faroese have hunted whales since time basically immemorial as people with more land have hunted deer. They are also allowed to, under international law, to hunt whales just as say Inuit are. Their hunting is sustainable, always has been.

        The anti-whaling convention was instituted to stop commercial exploitation of the seas, to stop the great whaling ships, it was not instituted to stop people feeding themselves.

        So kindly fuck off and I have a song for you.

        • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          5 months ago

          If there were a nation that still practiced cannibalism, should everyone be fine with it because they’ve been doing it a long time and it’s part of their culture? Even if sustainable because they only ate the criminals?

          Just because something has been done for a long time doesn’t mean it should still be acceptable, especially as we learn more such as the intelligence and importance to the food chain that whales have. It’s not like there are no other options.

          • barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            5 months ago

            Let me guess yet another vegan.

            The Faroer don’t have enough arable land for everyone to switch to a vegan diet. They could import the rest of what they need, yes, but their only notable export product is fish so that wouldn’t make much sense would it.

            And with “only notable export product” I mean “stamps are on place number two”. You know, the kind you glue onto envelopes.

            • Spacenut@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Just to be clear, you’re no longer saying it’s ok to kill whales because it’s cultural and they’ve been doing it a long time? You’re now saying that it’s ok because they would be economically ruined if they didn’t kill whales?

              I’m not trying to be combative, just trying to clarify.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Both are things that make killing whales ok. It’s just that when arguing with vegans “they’d literally starve” is a way more productive argument.

                • Spacenut@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Got it, thanks for clarifying. I think both lines of reasoning have problems though:

                  1. X is ok because it’s cultural and we’ve been doing X for a long time.
                  2. Y is ok because we would be economically ruined if we didn’t do Y.

                  I can think of many things to fill in for X and Y that satisfy the necessary conditions, but still aren’t ok. I do, however, think this line of reasoning is valid:

                  1. Z is ok because we would literally starve if we didn’t do Z.

                  I don’t think any vegan would take issue with #3, since in that case Z is necessary, and vegans are only concerned with unnecessary harm.

                  • barsoap@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    I mean I could have gone deeper into it but then I didn’t particularly feel like arguing with a vegan. Yes, I’m speciesist, we can leave it at that.

                    The Faroer certainly needed whaling in the past to survive, and that necessity has engrained itself in their solidarity culture – everything about how the hunt is done and distributed is communal, closest comparison I can come up when looking at Germany would be the status of the fire department in a village: Not the inn, not the church, not even the football club, but the fire department is the core and beating heart of the community and its solidarity. They had a brief stint with commercial whaling but they stopped that before commercial whaling got outlawed, couldn’t compete with the Norwegians and their giant ships.

                    Faroese being as green and nature-conscious as they are they would indeed stop if the whales were endangered… but they aren’t. Dolphins are controversial, I guess they’re going to stop hunting them within the next decade or two. That, or the rest of us are going to poison the seas even more so that the meat becomes completely inedible. It’s dire.

        • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          5 months ago

          Why do you care more about one person than your culture of murdering whales? Why do you speak up about him but not your tradition that you apparently don’t participate in??

            • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              5 months ago

              No amount of whaling is currently sustainable, and won’t be for many generations.

              • barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Long-finned pilot whale, Atlantic white-sided dolphin. Neither are endangered, on the contrary: Both are listed as Least Concern.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Gross. Whales are intelligent, social creatures. That’s like eating chimpanzee.

                • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Maybe they also don’t eat pigs? I eat meat (FUCK chickens), but I haven’t eaten pork for years after getting to know my neighbors pet pigs. Sure, they’re more socialized and a whole different breed from factory farm pigs, but still they’re too smart for me to be comfortable eating them. But my point here is that you’re accusing them of hypocrisy or inconsistency, without ever establishing that they actually are being hypocritical or inconsistent.

              • Emerald@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                That’s not really a good take though. You don’t need to be intelligent or social to be worthy of the moral consideration to not be eaten. Otherwise we’d be eating babies.

                • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Yeah, that doesn’t logically follow. Nobody said it’s the one, singular consideration.

                  You’re comparing a species of animal (whale) to the age of an animal (baby). Two completely different things…

    • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      He has done more harm for his cause by insisting on being front and center in wale wars. The Japonese wale hunters were more appealing than him.