alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agoTelegram founder's arrest part of larger investigation into alleged child exploitation and drug trafficking 'complicity'www.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square32fedilinkarrow-up1106arrow-down14
arrow-up1102arrow-down1external-linkTelegram founder's arrest part of larger investigation into alleged child exploitation and drug trafficking 'complicity'www.nbcnews.comalphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square32fedilink
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down2·edit-24 months agoTelegram encryption is not E2EE
minus-squareyetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·4 months agoOh you mean server-side encryption? I’m fairly certain that Telegram is already handing out these keys anyway, since every country has laws regarding that. Server-side encryption is worth jack shit
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·4 months agoYes, well the rumor is that the French want them.
minus-squarethemarty27@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·4 months agoTelegram does have E2EE chats (called Secret Chats), though they are only one-on-one, not enabled by default and their encryption is dubious.
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down11·4 months agoThey don’t. Telegram has keys. Also theres a ton of evidence of backdoors.
minus-squareyeehaw@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·4 months agoPatiently waiting for citation…
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down13·4 months agoFor what, exactly? I thought this was common knowledge.
minus-squareyeehaw@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·4 months agoYou made the claim, I did a quick search https://duckduckgo.com/?q=telegram+backdoors&t=fpas&ia=web Nothing popped up obvious.
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down11·edit-24 months agoI asked a question so that I could give you the information you’re looking for.
minus-squareyeehaw@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·4 months agoThat’s confusing, what?
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down8·4 months agoI don’t understand what’s confusing you. I asked you a question and you didn’t answer it.
minus-squarethemarty27@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoCan you post a source about either of those claims? I’ve found nothing to support either of them.
Telegram encryption is not E2EE
Oh you mean server-side encryption? I’m fairly certain that Telegram is already handing out these keys anyway, since every country has laws regarding that. Server-side encryption is worth jack shit
Yes, well the rumor is that the French want them.
Telegram does have E2EE chats (called Secret Chats), though they are only one-on-one, not enabled by default and their encryption is dubious.
They don’t. Telegram has keys. Also theres a ton of evidence of backdoors.
Patiently waiting for citation…
For what, exactly? I thought this was common knowledge.
You made the claim, I did a quick search
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=telegram+backdoors&t=fpas&ia=web
Nothing popped up obvious.
I asked a question so that I could give you the information you’re looking for.
That’s confusing, what?
I don’t understand what’s confusing you. I asked you a question and you didn’t answer it.
Can you post a source about either of those claims? I’ve found nothing to support either of them.