• Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Various services have the capability to fetch and copy hosted content (Mastodon, Lemmy, many more) but that capability is often restricted for larger files because those free servers don’t want to pay the massive bill for hosting video. I bet it’s also why Bluesky only recently added video support.

    The problem isn’t necessarily the federated hosting, but picking who pays the bill. Everyone wants to host fancy text messages, but nobody wants to pay for large files.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      That makes total sense. And I would guess decentralized hosting or federated hosting couldn’t meet this need?

      • Skull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        It probably would, but if you federate hosting, you’ll need to agree on things like “what file size is acceptable” and “who pays when a scraper fetches terabytes of data in a day”.

        Even with something like torrents or IPFS, someone needs to sacrifice storage and bandwidth to keep every file around. I don’t know of any good federated hosting solutions that would provide an experience acceptable to someone scrolling through a feed. The closest I can think of is one of those web3 scams, but that’d add the difficulty of variable storage costs (and inviting cryptocurrency traders).