AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoTrying to build viable third parties by voting for them in presidential elections is like trying to build a third door in your house by repeatedly walking into the wall where you want the door to be.message-square592fedilinkarrow-up11.08Karrow-down1162
arrow-up1921arrow-down1message-squareTrying to build viable third parties by voting for them in presidential elections is like trying to build a third door in your house by repeatedly walking into the wall where you want the door to be.AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square592fedilink
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down9·3 months agoThe problem is that these systems are way more complex and have edge cases where someone unpopular gets elected. Making major changes to a system that has worked for 248 years seems like a recipe for disaster.
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months ago and have edge cases where someone unpopular gets elected As opposed to the current system, where someone unpopular always gets elected? Making major changes to a system that has worked for 248 years It hasn’t worked. It’s deeply flawed and we currently use the worst-possible process, rooted in ancient history.
The problem is that these systems are way more complex and have edge cases where someone unpopular gets elected. Making major changes to a system that has worked for 248 years seems like a recipe for disaster.
As opposed to the current system, where someone unpopular always gets elected?
It hasn’t worked. It’s deeply flawed and we currently use the worst-possible process, rooted in ancient history.