Everyone is just assuming that he was killed on behalf of a disgruntled (or dead) customer. But it could have been another rich person killing him for rich people reasons.
Back in the middle ages, the code of chivalry came to basically be a gentlemen’s agreement between nobles which was generally adhered to even in times of war: “hey, there aren’t very many of us, so kill all the peasants you want but try to just capture and ransom the nobles.”
I wonder if there’s a similar agreement among the 1% today.
Everyone is just assuming that he was killed on behalf of a disgruntled (or dead) customer. But it could have been another rich person killing him for rich people reasons.
The words on the bullets seem designed to make very clear why he was killed.
I first didn’t know what you meant, but just checked and articles say they were “deny”, “defend”, “depose”.
Though I see people posting this:
https://pdfupload.io/docs/0d380e9b
Perhaps it really were: “delay”, “deny”, “defend”
Back in the middle ages, the code of chivalry came to basically be a gentlemen’s agreement between nobles which was generally adhered to even in times of war: “hey, there aren’t very many of us, so kill all the peasants you want but try to just capture and ransom the nobles.”
I wonder if there’s a similar agreement among the 1% today.
It’s a big club and you ain’t in it
Mathematically speaking, almost no one is.
There aren’t enough of these events for that to not be the case.
That’s kind of what I was thinking.