• skye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    What is the distinction between consumerism for a child’s happiness vs an adult’s?

    If the goal here is to prioritise corpo negative profits over someone’s happiness, then the person’s age should be irrelevant here.

    An once a year indulgence into consumerism isn’t as harmful as you seem to think it is.

    Why not stop paying for the internet/electricity/any other commodities because you are now an adult?

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Oh but surely there is a difference. Children get special treatment in all kinds of ways. It’s part of our social contract.

      An once a year indulgence into consumerism isn’t as harmful as you seem to think it is.

      This is just as unsourced as OP’s claim. The reality is that mindless consumption of any kind is becoming a big problem for our planet, and Christmas has become basically a celebration of mindless consumption.

    • Boozilla@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      The economics of Christmas spending is mind boggling. It’s not a harmless once a year indulgence.

      • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        People carry debt from their Christmas gifts for the rest of the year, you’re right that it’s totally not harmless. I’m shocked how much some people spend on holiday gifts.