• fearout@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Let’s stop all progress until we deal with insert_your_problem_of_choice” has never been a good take, it stifles development without actually helping. In an ideal world that might work, but as is it just doesn’t.

    To add to that, and correct me if I’m wrong, but I doubt that starving children in India is actually a mere money problem. It looks more like a wealth distribution problem, and that one doesn’t get fixed by stopping space programs.

      • fearout@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        In that case you should formulate your thoughts more clearly. Right now it reads as exactly that — “stop wasting money on progressing in this field because look at this_problem”. So, what did you actually mean by your comment then?

          • fearout@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Also, I think that the wealth disparity should decrease as much as possible, and the fact that that’s what you got from my comments is just weird.

          • fearout@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ok, so googling it now, it seems like Indian space program has a budget of about $1,5 mln (holy shit they launched using that? I’m doubly impressed). I’m pretty sure that’s just the cost of some couch in the Antilia building.

            So I still fail to see your point. This is nothing compared to country’s budget, not even a rounding error.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Let’s stop all progress until we deal with insert_your_problem_of_choice” has never been a good take

      I mean, sure, most of the time.

      But when one is “a shit ton of kids is starving” and the other is “vanity moon mission we don’t gain knowledge from”…

      Yeah, maybe address the starving kids first.

      but I doubt that starving children in India is actually a mere money problem. It looks more like a wealth distribution problem, and that one doesn’t get fixed by stopping space programs.

      India flat out said the reason for this program is for PR…

      It’s not science, it’s not innovation, or the pursuit of knowledge.

      The reason they’ve spent decades and billions on this, is to try and seem like India is a 1st world country.

      That could also be accomplished by not having one of the world’s highest rates of childhood starvation and malnourishment.

      Instead they ignore that for “flashier” methods.

      • Reclipse@lemdro.idOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        India flat out said the reason for this program is for PR…

        It’s not science, it’s not innovation, or the pursuit of knowledge.

        What’s your source on this?

      • dhruv@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You know what I think the root cause of any money problem in India is? Corruption. It’s corrupt from the very top. It’s not exactly easy to fix it with a population that large either. It’s a mess and that’s why it’s a third world country.

        Edit: That’s one of the reasons it’s a third world country. I’m just highlighting what I find wrong. Corruption is connected to, no offence intended, some parts of its vast culture. And like the comment above mentions, wealth distribution.

    • BackwoodsBeatnik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You basically said what I was going to, but the ideal world part I disagree with.

      A world in which enough is grown to feed everyone and enough profit is produced to meet everyone’s needs doesn’t need to be ideal. It’s a world we live in now.

      The above dude should just stick to attacking the ultra wealthy and like you said, not space programs.

      But like I was saying, an ideal world isn’t needed. Just about 30% of the rest of us to physically and verbally confront the few thousand or so who take too much.

      • fearout@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ok, ideal is probably the wrong word here. What I meant is a world where narrowly focused efforts are actually fast and effective, it might be a good idea to heavily prioritise some stuff to deal with pressing misery-inducing issues faster. But as we currently are, that concept just isn’t rooted in reality.

        • BackwoodsBeatnik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I see what you’re saying, and please don’t think I was attacking you, rather adding to your point.

          I think a world you described is one where that 30% I mentioned were way more engaged politically globally.

          As it not being rooted in reality that’s the ceiling I want to break. 1 million people in a country making direct, unified actions, unified by class could achieve many of those fast and effective efforts.

          I feel you though, I feel that we are moving at a fraction of the speed we ought to be and could be going towards progress and it’s almost maddening not seemingly being able to do anything except know how fucked it all is.