• Tar_alcaran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s not true then, it’s not true now.

    Slaves were already barely profitable compared to paid labor before the civil war, and slave labour prison labour is only profitable because it’s massively subsidized by the US government.

    • Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They’ve always liked slave labor because they see work as a punishing thing to force people to do, and hard, painful and dangerous work is what you force on people you don’t like(/judge to be immoral).

      Increase the demand for productivity until the workers are sufficiently suffering (according to your personal idea of how much a worker should suffer). Now you’re their shepherd, putting them to work. You’ve taken personal responsibility to ensure they don’t have idle hands to do the devil’s work or whatever. The point is that you are good for forcing them to do this.

      This, I think, is the foundation of the Christian work “ethic”. Which essentially is to voluntarily punish yourself woth your work like this, to save your boss the trouble. Leaders love this religion for some very good reasons.

      The profit motive isn’t irrelevant to the equation at all, of course, but good profits aren’t necessary for them to desire the continuation of punitive labor.

    • TeoTwawki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same is actually true for most fossil fuel production now - only has profits because of subsidizing.

      The folks profiting spend part of that profit to pay for politicians to continue the cycle.