Not mine but sounds like a showerthought to me. TL;DR ChromeOS is the “wrong” version of Linux and has 4% while GNU/Linux has 3%

  • nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because the biggest practical downside of Linux is a lack of natively developed big name software. It’s annoying to find some great software that perfectly meets your needs and then discover than it can’t run with decent performance on Linux.

    Market share growing means that Linux becomes a better and more accessible option.

    • const_void@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So what’s the magical percentage of market share that gets Adobe to port their proprietary software over to Linux?

      • Doods@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If they support Macs then whatever these things’ market share is, I suppose.

        • sheepyowl@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wikipedia is using this site as the source, and that site shows around 20% market share for Mac. Linux is at 3% and ChromeOS is at 4%, so if you combine them and double that it still isn’t at 75% of the market share Mac has.

          This isn’t mentioning that dealing with Linux compatibility is more annoying than Mac or Windows compatibility. Macs are very uniform, Windows has a giant making sure everything is compatible, and Linux has 900 distros that will never agree to co-operate.

          • parrot-party@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Windows is also ridiculously good at backwards compatibility. Mac frequently just breaks old software and Linux is largely unconcerned because they assume anyone that cares will find a way. That backwards compatibility is over of the major keys to Windows success with developers.

            • mwqer@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              But Linux is good at backward compatibility tho. Linus Torvalds leadership made sure that very few if at all any changes to the kernel will break existing userland. This means that if you have a program with their needed dependencies in the right version (which is easy with docker/flatpak/appimage) your programs will run flawlessly even if they are from the 90s.