Scientists observe world's 1st repairing metal — are self-healing robots coming?
www.livescience.com
Microfractures in nano-size copper and platinum have been observed healing themselves from repeated tugs. The discovery could lead to the construction of self-healing structures and machines.

“Of course, there are lots of industries whose product engineers would love to translate this finding into intentional engineering approaches to create metals that automatically heal themselves in our structural applications,” lead-author Brad Boyce, a materials scientist at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico, told Live Science. “Self-healing metals could be useful in a wide range of applications from airplane wings to automotive suspensions.”

Edited : clickbait title

    • Riddick3001@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      3·
      1 year ago

      Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no

      Well, it’s a bit of clickbait headline imo.

      I tried to cut of the last bit. But it wouldn’t let me make a post without the original title, unfortunately.

      • A_A@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        1 year ago

        in my tests I could modify the headline has I like. First I put the URL … there is a suggested headline … which I can modify or copy and paste … then I can modify the text of the post. You can even modify it once it is published !

        • Riddick3001@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
          2·
          1 year ago

          in my [tests]

          Tnx for the tip.
          I haven’t tried it via the website. Mainly using Jerboa lately. I thought it could be a community thing, but I’m no expert though. Just tried to find the modification button, but it wasn’t there (now).

          Update: In another layout/ page I found the mod button and managed to change the title!

    • fearout@kbin.social
      7·
      1 year ago

      Can any headline that ends in a question mark be answered by the word no?
      No.

      Here’s a quote from that wiki page you linked to:

      A 2018 study of 2,585 articles in four academic journals in the field of ecology similarly found that very few titles were posed as questions at all, with 1.82 percent being wh-questions and 2.15 percent being yes/no questions. Of the yes/no questions, 44 percent were answered “yes”, 34 percent “maybe”, and only 22 percent were answered “no”.

      In 2015, a study of 26,000 articles from 13 news sites on the World Wide Web, conducted by a data scientist and published on his blog, found that the majority (54 percent) were yes/no questions, which divided into 20 percent “yes” answers, 17 percent “no” answers and 16 percent whose answers he could not determine.

      • Gnothi@lemmy.world
        2·
        1 year ago

        You are of course correct, the ‘law’ as written is way too vague to actually even apply in many situations. But it is a fun way to call out articles like this!

        I would personally say it is more of a rule of thumb for identifying clickbait journalism. But calling it that isn’t catchy enough, much like the first half of this article’s headline 😄

        • fearout@kbin.social
          2·
          1 year ago

          I just found it kinda funny that the rule is actually wrong irl since yes is more common across the board, yet when formulated as a question the answer to it is no :)