• what_is_a_name@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is nearly no benefit of being on the largest instance. In fact many would benefit from a smaller instance.

    • Anafroj@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Playing devil advocate, here : you can expect the life expectancy of bigger instances to be slightly to significantly bigger, if anything because their admins feel more responsibility due to the number of users depending on them. That argument does not hold if we’re comparing using a big instance vs self-hosting, though (the life-expectancy of your self hosted instance may be smaller, but if you shut it down it means you’re not interested anymore in the fediverse, so no big deal - except maybe for the holes you leave behind you). And anyway, I’m not sure better life expectancy is more important than making sure the fediverse stays decentralized.

      • Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a good argument for bigger instances, but not one for using the largest one. Lemm.ee, sh.itjust.works have more that 2k members, sopuli.xyz and reddthat.com have 600 members, based on your argument their expected life expectantly is as long as Lemmy.world