I just realized that none of the comments or posts I made in the last week from my instance are getting to lemmy.world.

I went to see if I my instance was defederated. No, still showing as connected.

I then went to see if I got blocked or banned. Nope, my username is not showing up in the modlog anywhere.

Is it because my instance is small? I guess not, because I can interact with people and communities from anywhere else just fine.

At the moment, the only plausible explanation I have is that lemmy.world is overwhelmed and dropping messages from smaller instances. They do however everything in their power to keep more users coming up.

Yeah, I get that they were being attacked. I can only imagine that getting DDOS’d is not fun, and worrying about the Schmoes on the smaller instances is not a top concern.

But even in the middle of these constant outages and attacks, the lemmy.world admins are still keeping registrations open? Why? Wouldn’t it be better if they encouraged the users to move out of the instance to reduce the load? Isn’t the whole point of decentralized technologies to be, you know, decentralized?

I shouldn’t have to come here, create an account and make things even more centralized just so that I can tell people that this attitude is hurting the fediverse.

I wouldn’t be so pissed at this if it weren’t for the fact that some many communities were created here and is making this particular instance a crucial part of the fediverse, but the admins seems to be more worried about getting their user count up than the health of the overall system.

Please, admins, the more you go with this unstable federation and open registrations, the more of an incentive you are creating to centralize this further here. Help the fediverse and help yourselves. Close down registrations and focus on ensuring that everyone can access the communities that are being formed here.

  • Antik 👾@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    We are not ‘dropping’ messages from smaller instances. @ruud@lemmy.world and others did tighten up some things to fend off some attacks but that should not interfere with the federation.

    If you could have at least mentioned your instance name we could ask our backend administrators to have a look and we could get back to you with an informed answer.

    We will not close registrations, what we will do is show people information on how the fediverse works and give them the option to register on other instances. That will be implemented in the next couple of days.

    • youarehurtingthefediverse@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      As for why I am not naming my instance: this post went to -1 as soon as it got posted. My comments are also being downvoted quite quickly. I don’t believe that I am being rude or uncivil, yet it feels like mods and admins are more worried about fighting to keep the status quo than helping the community at large, and I’d worry about retaliation.

      • elrac@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, you named your account “you are hurting the fediverse” to come and ask them to close registrations then you ignore their questions. Seems kinda rude to me.

      • Evirisu@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, you are demanding something in a very unrespectful way, without considering the negative impact that could have in the grow of the fedi as a whole, and say that any reason why you could be wrong is an excuse that you need to adress. But it must be the admins who need to mantain the status quo if you get downvoted. I think you are not being very self aware.

      • Chozo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t believe that I am being rude or uncivil

        Well, herein lies the problem, because the rest of us do. You’re assuming that you know better than the people who have been doing this for years, and dismissing their attempts to help as “excuses”. I really don’t know what other outcome you could have possibly foreseen with this combative attitude.

      • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The reason you’re being downvoted is because you experienced a problem (Posts from your instance won’t show up in this instance), came up with a pet theory for why that problem might be happening (This instance must be dropping posts from small instances because it’s overloaded from all the users), assumed it was correct (Based on what, exactly? Because it’s definitely not correct), then came here to post about it in a very confrontational, demanding, and accusatory tone, with a seeming lack of desire or ability to consider that you may be the mistaken one. Moreso, the change you’re suggesting would have dramatic and perhaps negative repercussions for both this instance and Lemmy as a whole.

      • Treczoks@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe the reason is that you behave like a first-class asshole idiot? You wanted help, but evaded the reasonable question for your instance name. Several times. While making unreasonable demands. I’ve seen a lot of idiots in thirty years of being on the internet, and seriously, you are one of the bigger ones.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Would be nice if you could mention more instances than the top 5. The way things look right now, Lemmy is becoming centralized with all communities and users on a handful of servers.

      • Antik 👾@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Another thing to keep in mind is that when an instance goes down you lose the content. Instances should be reliable too. So just listing any random instance and overloading them would not help either. Imagine running a private instance for yourself and some friends and getting randomly listed on the signup page here…

        • 1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t think small instances have a reliability problem. They actually lack users right now. And of course you wouldn’t sign every new person up to the same instance, because that is against the entire point of the technology here.

          I seriously believe it would be much better for the Lemmy network to spread people out on the existing instances.

          • Antik 👾@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            Which is why we will adjust our sign-up page. But not every small instance wants new users because that would increase operating costs which they might not be willing to cover.

            • 1984@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              No that is caused by instance owners not closing registrations when their instance is full.

              It’s a lot of common sense actually in how Lemmy software is built. You can choose to upgrade your instance or you can close registrations if the load becomes too big.

              It’s up to the instance owner how to deal with that, given the chance.

          • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think it’s more a case of long-term reliability than day-to-day reliability. Anyone can create a lemmy instance - including people who may lack the resources or long-term motivation to keep their instance on the internet for basically forever. That’s definitely going to be a much smaller risk with the more established instances - though I’m sure we’ll eventually have a lot of drama over some instance or another in the top 10 shutting down.

            • 1984@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah but if they don’t get users, they will shut down guaranteed.

              If they get users, they will likely enjoy having an instance more and take care of it.

              So it’s a bit like chicken and the egg here. You have to give smaller instances a chance to grow or they will shut down of course.

              • zkfcfbzr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I don’t disagree with what you said, but I am more risk-averse than you are about it. I think it would be best in the long term to list servers with a proven dedication to the long-term existence and health of the community. This doesn’t necessarily mean the top 5, or even the top X, but it does mean excluding a server hosted on a laptop in someone’s closet with 8 users, or instances from completely unknown in the community admins that have existed for a month.

      • Plopp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        Personal anecdote: I probably wouldn’t have joined Lemmy if it wasn’t for lemmy.world and I think I’m far from alone.

        • AnonymousLlama@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          People hear from others that Lemmy is the place you go and when searched for you end up here. Having registrations closed doesn’t sound like a great idea when most people have no idea about the fediverse

        • SmashingSquid@notyour.rodeo
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Same, I started with Lemmy.world to begin with because I didn’t really understand the fediverse and didn’t want to go through choosing. After I understood federation more I set up my own instance. If I didn’t start with Lemmy.world I probably wouldn’t have tried Lemmy at all.

      • Antik 👾@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        54
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Instead of mentioning your instance so we can help you you seem to have other motives.

        Edit: but if you want the logic. We had discussions internally as well as with other instance admins about this and the conclusion was - even from other instance admins - that closing registrations would be a bad idea. Currently a lot of people are sent to lemmy.world from reddit and 3rd party apps for example. If people land here and are not able to register they might not look into it further and give up because it is too complicated or overwhelming. So that would actually be worse for the fediverse. That is why we want to make the sign up page more informative and provide options.

        • youarehurtingthefediverse@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          26
          ·
          1 year ago

          If people land here and are not able to register they might not look into it further and give up because

          Sorry, that’s a really bad excuse. Lemmy allows to have custom messages/taglines on the registration page, why not just add a quick paragraph saying “registration is closed because this server is overwhelmed, but here is a list of servers that you can use”.

          Make it a rotating list, change it every 2-3 days if you want.

          • Antik 👾@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So are you here to make us close registrations or do you want help with your problem?

            • youarehurtingthefediverse@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m also here to expose bad excuses.

              As for help, @Wander@yiffit.net has pointed me to the right direction, and he didn’t need to know my instance to do so…

              • blightbow@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I’m also here to expose bad excuses.

                Not being able to help someone who is refusing to provide technical detail is a pretty damn good excuse in this industry.

                If your goal is to expose the bad excuses of others, step one is to put in as much effort as you’re expecting from others. :P


                Edit for good measure: (links fixed, forgot about direct linking comments from outside of a lemmy instance)

                • Your instance was not federating with lemmy.world. [1]
                • You assumed that the blame had to rest on lemmy.world because you had “eliminate[d] all the possibilities [you] had at hand”. [2]
                • You made this post to vent about a bunch of unrelated nonsense and refused to provide technical detail that would assist the admins in troubleshooting. It’s a given fact that your privacy is your choice, but it’s also a given that you shouldn’t be a dick about it if you choose to withhold details, even from PM. For the record, the information being requested was the bare minimum for an instance administrator to troubleshoot network interactions with a remote instance.
                • A random (but cool) third party identified the issue with your instance not federating. [3]
                • Instead of apologizing, you proceeded to act like you were entitled to that solution from the admins you wrongly accused. [4] You are not god’s gift to the internet and they are not technical support for your instance.

                There’s no room for niceties here, you are either an asshole in denial or some brat who is too young to know any better. Sleep on it. Come to terms with that fact and make good on it, or don’t. You aren’t worth anyone’s energy, and I’m only bothering with this summary for everyone else’s sake. Your problem is fixed, it was never on lemmy.world’s side to begin with, and somehow you are still acting like the failure of the admins to figure out what was busted with your shit is some Sherlock gotcha moment.

                I am unaffiliated with lemmy.world and my toxicity does not represent the opinions of the admins. (but they’re probably thinking it)

              • Antik 👾@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Well he didn’t implement IP bans on his instance I bet. The reason I asked for this information is so I could check if your IP ended up on our banlist or check if it was marked as inactive.

          • Chozo@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I get the feeling that you’ve never been in charge of UX before. What you’re suggesting would be an absolutely terrible user experience. You have to realize that not everybody is as interested in new things as you or I might be, so even the smallest of hurdles will be prohibitive for most users.

            • Antik 👾@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              So he just wants us to close and leave them in the dark, right?

              This is being handled by a team that knows what they are doing. Together with someone that contributes to Lemmy.

            • Antik 👾@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              25
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s the attacks. The amount of users or communities is not the problem but there are people who want us to close down (registrations) for a variety of reasons.

        • AnonymousLlama@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Perfectly fair. People coming from Reddit specifically need to be eased into the fediverse and saying “whoops sorry we’re full / closed” isn’t great.

          Ideally if we want things balanced people should be on multiple instances but I’d rather several slower, bigger instances in the meantime until the community expands.

          Cheers for the work you guys do!

      • PaulDevonUK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        “If you could have at least mentioned your instance name we could ask our backend administrators to have a look and we could get back to you with an informed answer.”

        Try answering their request. Stop going on about registrations, at least until the above is resolved.

        • Antik 👾@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think it is already answered in this thread.

          • let us know which instance (even by pm) do we can have an informed reply as to what is going on. There have been changes made in the backend to fend of attacks but this should not affect federation.
          • There is a bug in Lemmy where instances are too early marked as ‘inactive’ and will stop federating.

          Btw the title of this thread is ‘stop registrations’ not ‘help me find out what is going on’.

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m not seeing dropped messages. I can see that a comment in this thread made it through just fine. However, I am seeing since around 09:30 yesterday that get requests for comments (and maybe other activities) are being responded to with 400 “not_logged_in”. I’ve quite a few messages in error queue stacking up because of this.

      Edited to clarify. The instance is running kbin.

        • r00ty@kbin.life
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a federation message. For example I receive a federated like message, and so my instance fetches the comment (and all parent comments) if not already present in my DB. It has the correct headers to be activitypub. So it should be allowed.