dampfnudel@lemmy.zip to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agotrashmessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up122arrow-down10
arrow-up122arrow-down1message-squaretrashdampfnudel@lemmy.zip to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 year agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squarefrankblack@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·1 year agoNot recommended as one service could screw up all the tables. Each service should have its own DB and then use persistence to a SSD or a NFS
minus-squareRicaz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoVirtually all database solutions support limiting users to specific databases/schemas/tables/whatever you need. Persistence to NFS is also generally bad advice for most databases for performance reasons.
Not recommended as one service could screw up all the tables. Each service should have its own DB and then use persistence to a SSD or a NFS
Virtually all database solutions support limiting users to specific databases/schemas/tables/whatever you need.
Persistence to NFS is also generally bad advice for most databases for performance reasons.