Like, I’m on a plane. I don’t want to watch Toy Story when I can do that at home, I want to see what the pilots see. And that way every seat has technically a window to look out of.

  • debounced@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    ILS :-)

    But you have to trust the instruments and not become disoriented, takes lots of training and practice.

    • xilophor@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or Autoland or a HUD landing which both can go down to 0/0, conditions permitting. There’s a lot of tools these days that pilots (especially Air Transport Pilots) can use to fly. And yes, all of it requires fairly extensive training.

      • Marxism-Fennekinism@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        After watching Mentour Pilot I have an appreciation of just how much training they undergo. It’s basically the closest thing we have to a real Starship Enterprise type setting where the captain seems to have an answer to everything that comes up, because that’s precisely what they aim for.

      • teft@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        And yes, all of it requires fairly extensive training.

        Pffft I’ve played Flappy Bird. How hard can it be?

      • Zippy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Very few airports are rated for it. Hong Kong is the only one that I know off hand. Mainly because they have so much fog and not great alternatives that they allow it. Very few planes keep up that certification either unless they commonly land in those situations.

        That being said, in a crunch, the majority of modern aircraft could likely do it if there was no other choice. Might result in a hard landing and damage but would be survivable.