• devils_advocate@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    On the other hand, YouTube is also supporting some content creators you hate…

    … But at least you don’t have to watch them.

    • mild_deviation@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      YouTube is a business with a clearly-defined business model, precisely-tracked direct metrics, and automation up the wazoo. Not a government taking taxes and dealing with human elements for which there are very few direct metrics. They can pay creators based on watch hours or some other usage metric.

      • devils_advocate@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I mean is that paying for YouTube premium is a very indirect and inefficient way to support your preferred content creator.

        • exi@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          But my preferred content creator could not exist without YouTube and YouTube shoulders the enormous expense of hosting videos. I don’t get why they should not get compensated for that as well.

          • devils_advocate@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s an ok justification, but I thought you were buying YouTube premium to support your content creator, not to support YouTube. YouTube premium doesn’t support your content creator.