What business practices in particular?
What business practices in particular?
Then carefully remove the sprouts and eat the rest.
Yes. It’s possible, but they are not of interest to nuclear power states.
There are nuclear plants in operation today that do not use or create any fuel that is capable of being weaponized.
And they cost too much. Governments only fund weaponizeable fission.
In fact, coal plants admit much more radiation than a modern nuclear power plant.
Not in a way that can be concentrated and weaponized.
Isn’t the main worry the “side product” of weapons grade nuclear materials?
Buy a second phone?
Invisible instant tattoos delivered in the same way as a vaccine? That is new. It’s not easy to mark someone without them knowing.
Gates funded. Tick. Spy program (covert tattooing). Tick.
You’re the one moving the goalposts by inventing new GPS tracking strawmen arguments.
Do you often tattoo excel spreadsheets on your body?
It’s the gates funded spy program you referred to. You don’t need compute resources or location tags. Just a way to store data on a person.
Get vaccinated, get tattooed
Passed your driving test, get tattooed
Pay your tax, get tattooed
Arrest at a protest, get tattooed
Etc.
Partially enabled. Without mRNA we still would have had J&J and Astrazenica.
Belief isn’t needed.
MIT researchers have now developed a novel way to record a patient’s vaccination history: storing the data in a pattern of dye, invisible to the naked eye, that is delivered under the skin at the same time as the vaccine. https://news.mit.edu/2019/storing-vaccine-history-skin-1218
And Bill Gates talking about doing it in a reddit AMA.
Yes. The Jannsen and Oxford vacancies.
However, vaccines using mRNA technology are VERY new.
MIT researchers have now developed a novel way to record a patient’s vaccination history: storing the data in a pattern of dye, invisible to the naked eye, that is delivered under the skin at the same time as the vaccine.
The research was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Motive is subjective but the funding isn’t.
That’s an ok justification, but I thought you were buying YouTube premium to support your content creator, not to support YouTube. YouTube premium doesn’t support your content creator.
What I mean is that paying for YouTube premium is a very indirect and inefficient way to support your preferred content creator.
On the other hand, YouTube is also supporting some content creators you hate…
… But at least you don’t have to watch them.
Ohio always starts me singing the snow white dwarf song
Today’s kilt today was invented in the 1720s by the Englishman Thomas Rawlinson.
Add milk until the colour of He-man