• ErwinLottemann@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        i usually set the limit to 10MB and tell the users to fuck off when they want to send something bigger. there are more convenient methods to transfer larger files.

      • Red@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah! How interesting… work$ has been a Google shop for a while thus the 25m limit. Good work for o365 to enable the increase.

        Email is such a fickle system. I couldn’t imagine mobiles downloading 150m attachments when they only have a few GB of space…

        Maybe im just too old…

        • Unaware7013@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, the big use I’ve seen for the max size limit was sending cad drawings to/from vendors and clients. No mobile usage involved, just big files that needed transmitted to allow jobs to progress.

        • SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          With 128 already the most common storage size and 256 becoming that in the next few years, I don’t think a few GBs of free space is right

          • Red@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I agree. It’s just I forget that people use IMAP and choose to not download their data to their devices and leave it on servers that they don’t control. 🤷

            Also at 150mb, and maybe a 10gb storage allowance it doesn’t leave much room for the actual text content 😂