• QHC@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Pretty sure parent is making a glib reference to the common “eat the rich” saying. It’s meant to be a provocative way to illustrate a larger message of anti-capitalism and the immorality of extreme wealth disparity.

    • skogens_ro@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Let’s demonise a subset of the population and joke about murdering them just like my ideological comrades did in the 20th century! Look how provocative I’m being.

      • QHC@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Defending billionaires is an even more ammoral act than making a joke you don’t like, comrade.

        • skogens_ro@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 years ago

          I dislike seeing radicals joke about murdering their enemies. It dehumanises them which helps extremism takes hold.

          Of course that is the point of such jokes, but you shouldn’t be surprised if people call you out on it.

          • QHC@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yes, it absolutely is the point. I don’t think billionaires should exist, full stop. They have already dehumanized everyone but themselves, so IMO turnaround is completely fair in this situation. Starting with a very extreme demand like “eat the rich” gives us lots of room to negotiate their surrender.

            In general, I agree with you. But some cases are too important and cannot be reasoned with. As an otherwise avowed pacifist, I’d put “punch a Nazi in the face” on this list of acceptable moral hypocrisy, too.