Striker@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 1 year ago2+2=4 but what if 4 didn't exist?message-square27fedilinkarrow-up111arrow-down153
arrow-up1-42arrow-down1message-square2+2=4 but what if 4 didn't exist?Striker@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-squareDem-Bo Sain@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 year agobecause 4 doesn’t exist… …I suppose it could also be 10.
because 4 doesn’t exist…
…I suppose it could also be 10.
or 11 if 3 doesn’t exist either