• dedale@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yesteryear’s conspiracies are today’s common truth. Getting slowly used to that one.

    • jiml78@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you eat bananas? They are carcinogen too. Hell water will kill you.

      That is the problem with this type of non-sense. Everything is about dosing. Aspartame is not carcinogenic in the amounts humans consume.

      • dedale@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Feels like a spin to me to be honest.
        They used to say the same things about lead before transitioning to the current “unsafe at any dosage” view.
        Labeling everyday products as carcinogenic would work to muddy the waters after a few damaging papers on industry important products. I remember the ‘red meat is cancer’ craze breaking out suspiciously close to the first studies linking glyphosate to cancer.

        My euristic will be to take popular belief into account. I see it as emergent intelligence by trial and error, not merely nonsense.
        You do you of course.

        In my mind, the main reason to avoid edulcorants (including stevia and acesulfame), is that they taste like shit.

      • neuropean@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        UV rays from the sun cause cancer, but I wonder how many people put sunscreen on every time they go outside.

    • Bojimbo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was never a conspiracy, just that causation is hard and the the amount you’d have to drink for it to be a real risk is ridiculous. Also, anyone who is consuming 30 cans of soda a day is probably more likely to be over-exposed to other environmental risks.