• Maalus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    20-25 km to buy groceries means there should be public transport available to get you there. Or it means that your villages and cities are shittily built to not have neccessities within walking distance.

    • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      And in the countries where there is no such public transport, they still shouldn’t implement such a law until they get their public transport in order.

      • Maalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So they won’t implement such law ever because nobody will go for public transport. Instead they’ll add “one more lane”

    • nexusband@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Has nothing to do with shittily built, public transport for 5 people that’s available around the clock isn’t something that’s even remotely feasible, nor is it economical.

      Apart from that, if you think like that, you’re part of the problem. Where do you think the groceries will come from in the future? From farmers that go about with public transport?

      • Moneo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nobody advocating for reduced car dependency and public transportation want to force farmers or rural people to sell their cars and take the bus. This argument is so fucking stupid and so fucking tiresome.