• qwamqwamqwam@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Urim has been Israeli since the country came into existence, so I’m not really sure what you’re talking about. Unless your position is that all of Israel is occupied territory, in which case I invite you to take a look at what Palestinians did the moment they gained power over Jewish civilians and imagine that scene repeated across Jerusalem and Tel Aviv.

    • simulacra_simulacrum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think they’re saying that because it’s colonized territory and the native population was removed its occupied. So yeah basically arguing against the entire Jewish state. Not my argument just what that is sounding like.

    • Synnr@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      Urim has been Israeli since the country came into existence.

      There’s so much propaganda from both sides that I don’t know what to believe about who, but Israel has only been a country since 1948 - that’s after the invention of the Jeep, microwave ovens, Frisbees, jet aircraft, etc.

      I’m not aware of the agreement made with Palestine for the land, but I’ve seen enough videos of Israelis near the border, both citizens and uniformed men, throwing Palestinians out of their houses so Israelis could live there. Not to mention the violent acts.

      • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not aware of the agreement made with Palestine for the land

        That’s because it was owned by the British. Before them the Ottomans, Romans, and Israelites.

        • المنطقة عكف عفريت@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          It was ruled by those. The lands were still owned by Palestinians. The farm lands my mother’s family owned were given to them by the Ottomans very long ago to cultivate. Trey had since settled there and started a small town. In 1947/48 they were driven out at gunpoint. They had rifles and fought with them but not much beyond that. The entire family fled to Jordan, Syria, Kuwait, and some other places. I did a 23andMe test long ago, my mother’s side is almost entirely Levantian, they are from that area and have been in that area since ages, never took anyone’s lands, never hurt anyone. That’s your average Palestinian family basically.

          • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, and the Jews were driven out by the people who stole the land from them, which eventually ended up in the hands of the Ottomans, who then gave it to your mother’s family. Go back far enough and everyone has stolen land from someone else. What Israel is doing is fucked up, but they have a historical claim to the land as well.

            Arguing that it’s your land now because you’ve had it for a long time is like Americans trying to claim that they don’t benefit from colonization and have an unquestionable claim to the US because none of them were around when the native populations were slaughtered and forced into reservations. It’s not right to expect you to get up and leave at this point, but ignoring the fact that the land you’re sitting on was stolen is also wrong. It wasn’t really the Ottoman’s land to give.

            • المنطقة عكف عفريت@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yeah, and the Jews were driven out by the people who stole the land from them, which eventually ended up in the hands of the Ottomans

              Excuse me, but what year was this? At how many thousand years ago do we draw the line for things relevant today?

              EDIT: For reference, we are talking about 3,700 years ago.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        1948 is a tricky amount of time.

        It’s recent enough that the Palestinians still see the Israelis as recent occupiers, but far enough in the past that the Israelis have had several generations grow up there and see it as their home.

        So the Israelis don’t see themselves as occupiers while the Palestinians do.

        A 1-state solution is impractical at this point, but a 2-state solution leaves them as bitter enemies with a shared border neither side agrees on.

        It’s a hopelessly fucked situation created by people who have been dead for decades, and I don’t think anyone knows a clean way out of it.

        The only solutions are for them to share the space, which is pretty much impossible given the hatred, for them to divide the space, which will keep them at way with each other, or to let one side or the other have it all and end up with millions displaced or killed.

        But regardless of who is right and wrong and who should be allowed to live there and who shouldn’t, I think we can all agree that murdering innocent civilians is wrong whether Israel is doing it or Hamas.

        When Israel commits atrocities, they should be called out. When Hamas commits atrocities they should as well.

        All of this brings to question whether or not the West should support Israel as one side. And that’s a hard question to answer. The West created this situation, and really shouldn’t just wash its hands of all responsibility.

        As bad as Israel has been, the West can’t really walk away because they would be genocided. It’s been seen time and again that Iran, Hamas, Israel, Jordan, and others are perfectly happy to wipe them out.

        I personally think that instead of supplying Israel with weapons the West should have boots on the ground as peacekeeping forces. They should protect Israel AND Palestine from attacks. By supplying Israel, the West is complicit in their attacks on Palestinians and in the establishment of illegal settlements.

        • Synnr@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Damn, that is heavy and it really doesn’t seem like there’s any way for an eventual good peaceful outcome without a lot of bloodshed leading up to it.

          Thank you for taking the time to educate me on the subject instead of getting into a keyboard war. You wear the halo this evening.

      • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you want to lawyer around about historical shit, you can, and I can’t stop you. But any decent human being with a fucking soul doesn’t care for your pedantic bullshit when there’s hundreds of innocent people dead on the ground.

            • Synnr@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Ah, I’m “lawyering around about historical shit” (historical being within a lifetime) but I’m the one with a cold dead soul because hundreds of “the good people” who stole the land died, and you’re the one with a heart of gold who thinks it’s lol-worthy and likes to make jokes when tens of thousands of “the bad people” die fighting for their stolen land.

              Let me know when you want to attempt to argue in good faith, because as I said from the beginning I’m not well educated on the subject, and your tactics are failing.

              • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                And there you go, dehumanizing the victims and justifying their murder.

                • Synnr@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Are you trying to guess what my reply would be? If not, you seriously need to look in the mirror bud.

                  Hamas is a terrorist organization. They are horrific and should all be taken care of… take that how you will. Palestinians and Israel is should be able to live in peace. This much is self evident and shouldn’t be up for debate like you’re trying to do.

                  But Israel lobbing back over bombs and killing innocent civilians is the Spider-Man pointing at himself meme.

            • ReverseThePolarity@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              So if you encountered a criminal holding an innocent person hostage, you would shoot the hostage on the off chance that you might also hit the criminal. You would then shoot the paramedic trying to save the hostages’ life.
              Your version of the trolley problem must be pretty wack.

              • jcit878@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                you couldnt have a sillier interpretation of your own fantasy scenario.

                I would shoot for the criminal. Who, being the peice of shit he is, like Hamas, is likely to throw the hostage into the line of fire and whine about how much of a monster you are.

                You’re version of the trolley problem is as cooked as the wheels on woolies trollies