I guess not strictly news - but with all of the vitriol I have seen in discussions on the Israel situation, that have boiled down to arguments over wording, I feel that this take from the BBC is worthy of some discussion.

Mods, feel free to remove if this is not newsy enough.

  • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Terrorist isn’t really the right word to use. What’s going on over there is bilateral genocide. That’s the appropriate term to use.

    • JoBo@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s a very one-sided genocide. It’s just plain ridiculous to equate the two sides when it was Zionists who stormed the Arab mandate in 1947, Zionists (and later, Israel) who created hundreds of thousands of refugees with millions still stuck in miserable camps on the borders, Israel who has kept Palestinians under brutal occupation and blockade since 1967, and Israel who bombs densely populated cities with fighter jets while the brand new Hamas air force is using hang-gliders powered by fans.

      It’s such a difficult thing to explain to people whose primary exposure to the conflict is through the Western media but these accounts, by two Palestinian and Israeli non-violent activists, are well worth a read. Unfortunately I can’t find the original transcripts so it’s a google books extract and is missing some of George’s testimony.