If I don’t give it any permissions, does it actually do anything though? They only run when the app is open I assume?
If I don’t give it any permissions, does it actually do anything though? They only run when the app is open I assume?
The mold definitely should be fixed… But are ants not a tennant problem, not a landlord problem?
Still not showing anything from Lemmy right? I guess upvotes don’t convert to boosts? I tried favouriting the post, does that make it show?
They pointed cameras at wrong boats with similar flags sometimes as well
Isn’t this functionality already built into the default web UI?
That’s the routers business model though
‘cool’ is relative - the have to water the roads they build over the top to stop them melting!
oooh, ty
they just send a OTP to your email with the idea that you should be keeping your email secure (and that email providers are more secure than they can be)
The whole site seems like a PoC - the accounts don’t even have passwords! (I could actually kinda get on board with this)
Remember, they are not expecting to win, so this isn’t a policy they are expecting to have to implement, just using it to attract more of the right wing vote they are losing to the Reform UK party.
I don’t think Google has a road/mountain bike toggle for navigation does it? ☹️
It’s been a while since my politics A level, so I may get some of the terms wrong but hopefully the facts right.
As the UK doesn’t have a formal constitution, it relies on convention and that parliament is effectively all powerful (under the crown) in that if parliament (encompassing both houses in this context) votes for something it can do it. (As it represents the will of the people and has the authority of the crown (less relevant in the modern day))
Parliament can’t therefore lock a decision in such a way that a future parliament can’t change because the future parliament is still all powerful.
In practice though this isn’t entirely the case. You can make a law like you said, and while a future parliament can break it, it would (probably) look bad on them. But what does that do to stop politicians?
A further note on the previous chain - we go have two houses of parliament; the house of commons is the main one with the green benches that most will recognise. It has our elected representatives (MPs) in and (normally) where the PM is selected from.
The house of lords (red benches, appointed members for life) is generally considered the check chamber. It used to be able to block laws entirely, but I believe lost that power semi recently and it can now be overruled by the commons after 2/3 rejections.
Everything is eventually decided by the majority of votes in the house of commons. Even if you put a law in saying that the pm can’t do this without a 80% vote, that law itself could be repealed with a 50% vote.
Theoretically it would only require a 50% vote to remove elections or something crazy. (Although in practice that might not get past the king who technically has the final say)
There is no formal constitution that has more protection like in some countries.
Dammit, I came here to make that comment!
It really depends on the company. You can make fully remote work, you can make 20-40% work or you can do 80-100% work. However the company needs to be run with that in mind to ensure good communication/team building etc.
You also can’t just change the rules. If you change the split someone is going to be unhappy.
(And accept that your possible talent pool is reduced when you don’t offer remote work)
Those quotes aren’t in the parent comment?
What happens if you replace “www” in the URL with “old”?
They might not have the block there
Have you got a link for that?