• ITALIEN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Being new to Lemmy I’m very taken back by the amount of communist supporters everywhere. Where my capitalist bros at?

      • lugal@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re not even federated with the tanky instances…

        I give you a hint: lemmy is a decentralized, non commercial platform. The cap*talists are still on r*ddit

      • Mr Fish@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lemmy is a community hosted system, and a lot of the user base came here after leaving other platforms (mostly reddit) because of the owners making it worse and worse trying to copy other platforms like tiktok.

        And you’re wondering why everyone here has problems with capitalism.

        That’s not even mentioning the other huge problems with capitalism.

        • ITALIEN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          What?

          FOSS is great, I like the idea of people from all over the world contributing towards software that benefits the user rather than the creator.

          I fail to see how that equates to “communism good” though. That’s a huge leap in thinking. Really weird when surely most people on here live and benefit from capitalist societies.

          • xor@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            “you say capitalism but yet you live under capitalism, checkmate” doesn’t really work, because you don’t just get to choose the economic system you live in

            Sure, capitalism has brought significant improvements to quality of life, but given that the systems that preceded it were largely feudalism and subsistence farming, that’s not really a high bar.

            And it certainly doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t continue to develop economic and social systems that are even more equitable.

          • Mr Fish@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I fail to see how that equates to “communism good” though.

            The problem is that very few people make the decisions that impact everyone on the platform, which ends up meaning “capitalism bad”. Fixing that problem with a system that’s basically owned by users is sort of like making the system communist.

            surely most people on here live and benefit from capitalist societies.

            Sure, they live in capitalist societies, but do they honestly benefit from it being capitalist more than they would from it being communist or socialist? Are they really better off in a system that inherently increases inequality rather than decreasing it?

      • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve put some thought into how to respond to this but I just can’t get past “capitalism bros” so I’ll just say this, you can criticize the current market economy system most of the west has without being a full on communist. And those that are content with capitalism aren’t going to go out of their way to be a “capitalism bro”. So of course dissenting voices to the current status quo are going to be amplified here. Try to learn from others perspectives instead of seeking validation

        • ITALIEN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I meant that light heatedly but I see how that could come across as an immature comment. I guess where I’m coming from and failed to articulate in a constructive way is that I’m surprised there’s so much support for communism when likely most of the people on here live in capitalist societies that though have issues still allow them enough freedom to make those statements without fear of punishment.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gotta stop pretending “left” and “right” are useful labels to apply to politics too.

      • Prunebutt@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Please elaborate how “equality” and “hierarchy” based policies aren’t useful labels for politics anymore.

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They aren’t useless, but they are pretty broad strokes that will always have a use as long as we’re talking about any de facto two party states (e.g. those with FPTP voting systems).

        It’s also worth remembering that the population of one country’s idea of left wing politicians might actually end up being right wing elsewhere (for instance, people in the US saying their democratic party are lefty when in most of Europe they would be considered center-right or just plain right-wing).

        • Prunebutt@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s not what makes the terms useful.

          US Democrats aren’t left and the term is still useful in European politics.

          • 9point6@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not really saying what makes them useful, that’s a long list. I was more going for saying they’re not useless, but are potentially pretty ambiguous without additional context due to how people use them.

      • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve always liked a 2 axis spectrum. Social ownership/ private ownership on one axis. Authoritarian / libertarian on the other.

    • PatFusty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This comment doesnt make sense. I think its time for you guys to brush up on the difference between leftist and liberal left. CCP and leftist have the same agenda.

      • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        China is a corporatist authoritarian state. Basically late stage capitalism with a bunch of steps skipped. Corporations married to the government. Where the right wing in America is headed.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The irony is that the only Lemmy instances blocked in China are the tanky ones.