• Tyfud@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    It has no life to have a right to until it’s born.

    Go ahead and tell me about all the experiences you had in your mother’s womb. About the goals and aspirations you had before you came out. Tell me about your experiences, your emotional fortitude, hell, tell me anything at all about the time before you were born, from your perspective.

    A fetus does not have a right to life, but the mother does.

    Your views are getting real people with all their dreams, aspirations, goals, hopes, etc. killed, just so you can feel a warped sense of false moral superiority for a few minutes on the Internet.

    • cricket98@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Go ahead and tell me about all the experiences you had in your mother’s womb. About the goals and aspirations you had before you came out. Tell me about your experiences, your emotional fortitude, hell, tell me anything at all about the time before you were born, from your perspective.

      This does not really prove any point. Should people with memory issues be killed too? They don’t remember any of their goals/aspirations/experiences, so they aren’t alive according to you. There is evidence that babies in the womb are affected by their experience in the womb.

      A fetus does not have a right to life

      Why not? You just make that claim without really backing it up.

      Your views are getting real people with all their dreams, aspirations, goals, hopes, etc. killed, just so you can feel a warped sense of false moral superiority for a few minutes on the Internet.

      People are allowed to give their opinions on a topic. Maybe you argue online for a feeling of superiority but that doesn’t mean everyone does.

      • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Is a person with memory issues entirely dependant for survival upon the use of another person’s body without their consent? If yes, then that person gets to decide to withdraw all care at any time.

        • cricket98@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes. Someone with intense mental issues cannot live without the body of another human serving them. That doesn’t mean you are allowed to intentionally murder them. There are ways for babies to survive outside the womb.

          • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No, a person with memory issues is not dependent on any single person’s body for survival. They are dependent upon any person who offers to put in the work, and that person can quit the job at any time without penalty. Someone else will replace them quite easily.

            We don’t put slaves in charge of the care for the mentally handicapped. A woman who wants to be a mother does so voluntarily. But if you force a woman to keep a baby when she doesn’t want to, you are forcing her to labor. You are making her a slave. And lethal force to escape slavery is always self defense.

            That’s why the example you gave is bad and irrelevant

    • Throwaway@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      The next time some lemmy user says no one is wanting 3rd trimester abortions, Im going to link your comment. Its not going to do anything but waste time, but its going to be funny.

      • Tyfud@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This isn’t the winning strategy you think it is.

        I’d explain it, but I don’t have the time or crayons for you.

      • Ashyr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        No one who carries a fetus to the third trimester wants an abortion. Almost all third trimester abortions are health emergencies for women who are trying to be mothers.

        The idea that anyone would carry a pregnancy to the point your body is undergoing irrevocable changes just because they couldn’t be bothered to get around to it is absurd.

        A third trimester abortion is painful, traumatic and difficult compared to a drug-induced first trimester abortion.