• Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    What funny is both issue are extremely linked.

    Earlier this year, Isreal sign an agreement with Lebanon to help explore the area for gas and oil.

    Isreal anounced a new middle East to supply eroupe with gas.

    Iareal on October 19 or around ot awarded 12 companies the ability to explore gas and oil in the region.

    The only thing that was stopping them is Hamas.

    The expected value goes over 400 billion in the last few years, as expressed in a report by the UN about the gas field there.

    • Kalash@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      What funny is both issue are extremely linked.

      They are not. It’s a tiny region of the world and it’s ridiculous to even bring a climate consideration into such a conflict.

      The only thing that was stopping them is Hamas.

      Yes, and Hitler really liked dogs and Nazis did a lot for animal welfare. Fuck off.

      • gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Imagine thinking the Middle East, a “tiny region” which also just so happens to be where more than half of all oil used on Earth comes from, is irrelevant to the discussion of climate change.

        You probably wouldn’t be so angry if you weren’t having to bend over backwards to make nonsensical arguments like this to defend your nonsensical opinions.

    • Broodjefissa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Besides that i’d really like to know how much these sneseless wars contribute towards further polution. All the jets burning, ground vehicles moving, possibility of nukes

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Depends on how many lives are cut short and never become. If one woman were to have had 6 kids who then made another 12 grandchildren, their footprint would be much higher than if a woman never was going to have kids.

        Overall it is a dark topic. But ~7 lives to a fighter jet tank of gas if I saw correctly. (28 metric tons per tank) average footprint worldwide is about 4 per person.

        The moral of the story I suppose is to send everyone to war on foot, nude, and only hand to hand combat is permitted. Don’t want to figure out the footprint of a sword or hammer. Easier just to say pick up a rock.

        Now that that’s sorted, let’s have some tea.