• naonintendois@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    How would you make money as a mastodon instance? Pay to be a member? I don’t see the incentive for the average user to pay when it’s so easy to join a free instance (I’m considering the average person doesn’t know how to host their own).

    • maddy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      You could probably trust that an instance you’re paying for will be more stable/less likely to randomly shut down.

    • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      The incentive might become more apparent as time goes on.

      • long term up-time commitments
      • stability guarantees
      • dedicated Moderation services
      • dedicated help service
      • performance guarantees
      • additional features or parallel services beyond ordinary masto (eg search, blogging, feed sorting/algorithms, or even fusion of additional platforms like lemmy)
      • active sponsorship of developers contributing back to masto
      • subscription is part of a dedicated app too (see, eg, Mammoth)
      • gregorum@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        As a Mastodon subscriber on a typical server, I haven’t found any of that to be particularly necessary. Perhaps there are some advanced users who might find it useful though. 

        • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Interesting. I feel like long term stability, up time and performance would be valuable to many users. In many ways I’d say just going on to mastodon.social is a bit of a cop out as it heavily dilutes the decentralised structure that is arguably the point of all of this. Multiple paid instances would be healthier. And there, as a user on a relatively peripheral instance but one that is paid-for, longevity and stability become increasingly valuable.

          Otherwise, instance providers putting the work into trying to provide a relatively “complete” fediverse palette of tools while making it as easy as possible for the users could also be interesting.

          • gregorum@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            What I mean is that long-term stability and up time don’t seem to be a problem for current servers.

            • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yea I’d say it isn’t a problem for anyone until it is. All of the notable examples of a server going down that I’ve seen were a surprise to its users. On top of that, I’d expect many have fairly hefty expectations of their server’s longevity. Like 10-15 years, more or less as long as they’ve been using Twitter etc.

            • thegiddystitcher@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s definitely an issue with small, niche servers unfortunately. Had a friend’s just go down unexpectedly this week with no warning to let the handful of people on there migrate, so they’re starting over from scratch. My craft server shut down a couple weeks ago although we did get a month warning there so could go through the proper migration process.

              I try and donate to all my Fedi servers just to make it worth the admin’s while, because I prefer smaller servers in general but don’t want them to suddenly disappear!