• pelya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    548
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    YYYY-MM-DD is the only acceptable date format, as commanded by ISO 8601.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Except the information is given least to most important, making verbal abbreviation difficult. Works great for file names though.

      • Pulptastic@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s this really cool shorthand where you drop the year because it seldom changes. It’s called MM-DD

            • rchive@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Had a coworker who used MMDDYY with no dashes. Unless you knew it was very hard to figure out, since it could also just be a number that happened to be 6 digits, too. At least YYYY-MM-DD looks like a date generally.

          • CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            “I can reuse this old function if I just monkey-patch this other class to work with it, no one will have any issues understanding what’s going on”

            Edit: Thought this was the programmerhumor community. For context: A monkey-patch is when you write code that changes the behaviour of some completely different code when it is running, thus making its inner workings completely incomprehensible to the poor programmer using or reading your code.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you have years of files named similarly with the date, you will love the ISO standard and how it keeps things sorted and easy to read.

      • Agent641@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I have autohotkey configured to insert the current date in ISO 8601 format into my filenames on keyboard shortcut for just this reason. So organized. So pure.

          • Agent641@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Download Autohotkey, and create a new script. Paste these shortcuts into the script and restart the script:

            #NoEnv ; Recommended for performance and compatibility with future AutoHotkey releases.

            ; #Warn ; Enable warnings to assist with detecting common errors.

            SendMode Input ; Recommended for new scripts due to its superior speed and reliability.

            SetWorkingDir %A_ScriptDir% ; Ensures a consistent starting directory.

            :R*?:ddd::

            FormatTime, CurrentDateTime, yyyy-MM-dd

            SendInput %CurrentDateTime%

            return

            :R*?:dtt::

            FormatTime, CurrentDateTime, yyMMddHHmm

            SendInput %CurrentDateTime%

            Return

            Now, if you type ‘ddd’ on your keyboard, the current date will be typed out, eg ‘2023-11-23’.

            If you type ‘dtt’ tgen the datetime stamp will be typed out in YYMMDDhhmm format, eg 2311231012

            There are so many cool things you van do with AHK to make your work more productive. For example, rather tgan typing your email address a billion times, add the shortcut:

            ::add1::your.email.address@domainname.com

            And then you can type ‘add1’ and hit space, and your email address will be typed out in full. Of course, the string ‘add1’ can be whatever you want.

    • clif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      90
      ·
      1 year ago

      “There shall be no other date formats before ISO8601. Remember this format and keep it as the system default”

      • umbraroze@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        Funny thing, in ISO 8601 date isn’t separated by colon. The format is “YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SS+hh:mm”. Date is separated by “-”, time is separated by “:”, date and time are separated by “T” (which is the bit that a lot of people miss). Time zone indicator can also be just “Z” for UTC. Many of these can be omitted if dealing with lesser precision (e.g. HH:MM is a valid timestamp, YYYY-MM is a valid datestamp if referring to just a month). (OK so apparently if you really want to split hairs, timestamps are supposed to be THH:MM etc. Now that’s a thing I’ve never seen anyone use.) Separators can also be omitted though that’s apparently not recommended if quick human legibility is of concern. There’s also YYYY-Wxx for week numbers.

      • Unaware7013@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        This, but all run together.

        I write files/reports to disk a lot from scripts, so that’s my preferred format.

          • Unaware7013@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are you talking epoch? I don’t care for that mainly because it’s not human readable. I see the use for it, but I struggle with it in practical use.

            • naught@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yep. I mostly like datetimes for simple sorting. If it needs to be human readable iso is the way to go tho.

        • CoderKat@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          We are ridiculously inconsistent in Canada. I’ve seen all 3 of the most popular formats here (2023-11-22, 11/22/2023, and 22/11/2023) in similarish amounts. Government forms seem to be increasingly using RFC 3339 dates, but even they aren’t entirely onboard.

        • Remavas@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          (This doesn’t consider the separator) Cyan - DD/MM/YY Magenta - MM/DD/YY Yellow - YY/MM/DD The other ones are mixes of those two colors, so e.g. the US is MM/DD/YY and YY/MM/DD (apparently).

          Also just noticed I didn’t attribute this picture, I’ll edit my comment.

        • seth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          In many of them but not all, because it’s become convention and has been enshrined in their documentation policies. cGMP just requires that your quality management system has a policy in place that specifies how to document the date, and when exceptions are allowed (for instance, data printouts where YYYY-MM-DD is often the default).

          It’s also the reason some labs require you to initial/date every page of printed data, and some only require you to initial/date the first and/or last page. I’ve seen FDA auditors be okay with both, as long as you can justify it with something like: our documentation policy defines the printout as a copy of the original data, and the original data as what’s stored on machine memory with electronic signature; versus: our documentation policy defines the original signed/dated data printout as the original data. In any case, it still has to follow 21 CFR part 11 requirements for electronic records & signatures, where the only date predicate rule example they give is 58.130(e), which itself is broad and only applies to non-clinical lab studies. It’s notable that the date format 21 CFR 11 itself uses is actually Month D, YYYY, with no zero padding on the day.

          And if you don’t have IQ/OQ/PQ documentation showing how you locked down and validated the software’s ability to maintain an audit trail you can’t even use electronic records (or signatures).

    • geissi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      For file names, absolutely.
      When I’m asking what date it is I typically know the current year.