• glimse@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t use the catchphrase I think you’re referring to (Eric Andre?) but even if I did…the post I replied to is a generic catchphrase meme…so your point is kind of moot lol

          • Bonehead@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            The post title is the new mantra since the Reddit exodus, connected to very relevant content. It’s not just a low quality comment void of any nuance and designed solely to capture upvotes from the lowest common denominator…kinda like what they do on Reddit.

            • glimse@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Dude, that’s exactly what this post is lol

              Reddit sucks and we all know it. That’s why the majority of us are here

            • Remmock@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Catchphrases have cultural significance of having a shared understanding of the intent, both delivered straight and ironically. Your attitude is not conducive to a shared experience.

              Or are you suggesting that you never use quotes of any kind, regardless of the source?

              • Bonehead@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m suggesting that using a catchphrase as just a generic comment that could essentially be used on any meme is a low effort attempt at gaining reputation points. There was no message conveyed with it, no value was imparted to the discussion, and now we’re talking about how I’m the one with the non-conducive attitude and not about the actual subject…

                • Remmock@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It’s interpretable as a sarcastic response to someone taking a position against Spez, catchphrase or no. This doesn’t seem hard to understand.

                  Do you have the same issues with people who learn Valspeak or AAVE?

                  • Bonehead@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’ve already specified the type of comment that I’m referring to. Trying to drag this discussion into a direction where you can more easily win doesn’t actually prove your point.