• vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They had a warrant from a judge for threats. A judge determined that it was a threat. Threatening someone is illegal.

      Nobody was arrested, they were questioned and police took the computers as evidence.

      Edit: Nice edit

      • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        So thats a no. Im in no way defending them just that untill ive seen these threats im hestant to condem them.

        • vxx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No, you said this:

          I dont think anyone shpuld be arrested for speach. But i can understand germanys reasons to do such things

          completely ignoring the article because you’ve already made up your mind the second you read “speech”, suggesting Germany would arrest people for some harmless stuff.

          Are you in favour of not getting investigated after you’ve threatened someone?

          • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            1 year ago

            I still havnt seen these threats. And germany arrested 6million people for some harmless stuff so wouldnt put it past them.

            • vxx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You’re making a fool of yourself just because you would never admit to a mistake.

              This got to be the most stupid comment I’ve read the entire year.

                • vxx@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  The mistake of only reading the headline and also misinterpreting it completely, making assumptions in your extremist worldview.

                  • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    11
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Ok can you pleasd try being a little less hostile so we can have a productive discussion. Difference in interpretation is called an opinion we are all entitled to one. I didnt just read the headline. And thinking that we shouldnt arrest people based on speach is an extremist world view didnt knwo that.

                    From my interpretation they celebrated a terrorist attack. Wrong yes, moraly corrupt yes, should it be illegal no. If u think celebrating a terrorist attack should be illegal then then the very top of the arrest list would be the US government. And hate speach which nobody can actualy provide to me so god knows what they actualy said.