• Linechecker@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    My realizations over the years:

    Even if we make our cars less carbon-polluting by 25%, if we end up driving more, we could still end up polluting more.

    Even if the western nations pollute less, developing nations will still pollute a lot more and will get us to tipping points anyway, albeit perhaps slightly slower.

    Global warming effects are scary, but what’s worse is global cooling and Ice Age. Once the ocean’s balance is messed up by diluted salinity due to melted ice caps, who knows where this can go.

    • darq@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if the western nations pollute less, developing nations will still pollute a lot more and will get us to tipping points anyway, albeit perhaps slightly slower.

      Ehh, it’s worth noting that developing nations tend to pollute a lot less per capita. And as they develop they can transition to cleaner forms of energy, as they gain the economic ability to do so.

      Pointing at developing nations is a convenient excuse for developed nations to avoid taking the actions we need to take.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We should be subsidizing renewables in developing countries so that they never have a reason to use fossil fuels in the first place.

      • Linechecker@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not that simple to electrify with renewable. We’d need to mine wayyyy more copper for wiring. We’d need to produce wayyy more rubber for insulated coatings of all those wires. We’d need wayyy more transformers. And if every garage in America has a car charging in it, then we’ll need wayyy more batteries and We’d have a lot more load on our electric infrastructure. In the end, we’d still need fossil fuel infrastructure to account for when the sun’s not shining and wind isn’t blowing.

          • Linechecker@monero.town
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s great for them, I hope it was worth it in the end. And that would work great in a desert and southern California, but it won’t work to well in most of the USA due to weather.

              • Linechecker@monero.town
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Then why is it over $35k to get them installed on a house’s roof? And still I’d need to be plugged into the grid.

                  • Linechecker@monero.town
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Speaking from experience since I looked into it, there’s scammers peddling solar panels and overall, from a financial point of view, they are just a bad deal - Too much cost, with little upside with extra risk. In addition it certainly does not increase home values at all.

                    However, in southern California and deserts, it would make sense to get solar since the sun shines more.

                    Also wind turbine industry needs to start making recyclable blades cuz used blades take up a lot of space in landfills.