Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you’re a server admin, please defederate Meta’s domain “threads.net

If you don’t run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate “threads.net”.

  • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    How are we supposed to do that when people like you are encouraging admins to defederate which removes any semblance of freedom of choice that you are fucking trying to imply we act upon?

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re a multinational corporation, they don’t need us to host their shit for you to be able to read a goddamn article and learn something.

      If you don’t yet understand that they’re evil that’s on you.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          29
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Choose what? If you want to find an instance unscrupulous enough to federate with that company then go for it. Who is stopping you?

          • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            26
            ·
            1 year ago

            People like OP here, begging admin to block it?

            Like are you for real? He’s literally asking them to take my choice away.

            • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              27
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              It is always the admins’ choice, that has never been any different. You are free to choose which instance you are part of.

              This petition changes nothing about that.

              • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                19
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                “We need to defederate from them” is not a petition…

                Also, you could just choose not to subscribe to them, go to a place where they are defederated, or even just block them yourself with the right apps.

                That’s a whole lot of choice for you in a platform based around decentralization and user choice.

                But on the flip side if you just make everyone defederate them, then you’re removing user choice completely just based on your personal feelings on the matter.

                That doesn’t seem fair to me just because you personally hate something that I don’t.

                • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  21
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  We’re not making anyone do anything. This is a pledge for admins to volunteer for, to send a message that this instance won’t be welcome. There are going to be pariah instances, that’s the nature of federation. If you can’t find an instance to follow that federates with them, then that just means the thing you want is deeply, deeply unpopular.

                  If you care enough, you could join their instance. You could start your own instance and federate with them. Go for it. If and when your own instance becomes a pariah I’m sure you’ll whine about people taking away your freedom to be an asshole at them online, because nobody can make you learn a lessom you’re clearly set on not learning.

                  • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    19
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    If you can’t find an instance to follow that federates with them, then that just means the thing you want is deeply, deeply unpopular.

                    MFer how you expect me to find any if you keep going around begging them to wholesale block access.

                    Just don’t subscribe to it, or block it yourself! You don’t get to decide for everyone else what content they can access here

        • Zorque@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then feel free to go to threads or somewhere that does federate with them. You don’t have to stay on a particular instance if they don’t federate with something you want to engage with.

          That’s your freedom of choice.

          • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            1 year ago

            There is no plan for kbin to defederate with Threads, which is why I’m here you dolt. Maybe you should leave.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Then you’re evil. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

          Go ahead, be evil. It is certainly your prerogative.

          Edit: just look at how many votes “But what if some of us don’t care if they’re evil?” got. Like, what a wild-ass bullshit thing to say. This thread is definitely being astroturfed.

          • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve noticed a lot of turfing on all of these threadsfed posts. It’s becoming more and more. People just need to get a threads account if it’s so important to them.

            • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Well they’re clearly aware of us, we can’t pretend we’re just a bunch of silly little beans doing our own thing anymore. Of course they’re going to do this. There is literally not a single reason for them not to.

                  • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Sad but true. I think the only way anything could ever be restored to the bygone tangible days of the Internet would be to destroy Meta, fully.

                • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah, but the reason we need federation in the first place is because of the relentless onslaught of monopoly.

                  I think this is a good prpblem to have. The fediverse gets to test itself against the largest established social media network, and honestly I don’t see a way for them to win. You can ses it in these replies - they are scared of this boycott. Even more exciting now that I think of if - this isn’t a consumer boycott like we’re used to. This is a boycott by the producers. The instances create the network, so their voices are much more important.

                  • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’m old enough to know better than be excited. I haven’t seen a single good community have staying power in the time of the entire internet. And it’s only getting worse. Especially when a billion dollar tumor takes interest in where you’re at.

                    What I do find interesting and alarming is how aggressive Meta is in seeking out the small inconsequential pockets of the Internet and crushing them. They’re so deadset on fuxing any collective not being monitored by their government backed all seeing eye. It will be interesting to see how a federated social network holds up but I wouldn’t assume they don’t already have at least five game plans to crush it.

                  • 2deck@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    It is exciting. I’ve been impressed by the response to this. Reading between the astroturfing, there’s a community with a sense of purpose here.

                    Thanks to all who are here genuinely!

          • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Thanks, it is my prerogative.

            This is the point of the freedom of federated communities: we can read whatever the fuck we want from wherever the fuck we want without having authoritarian censor-heavy limp-wrist adult-baby moderators and corporate fascists determining what we are allowed to read or affiliate with.

            The freedom to read both sides and control what I want to interact with on my own will, and make my own decisions is why I’m fucking here. I don’t want people like you making decisions for me, go fuck yourself.

            Thanks for noticing I’m evil. I’ll go make a nice blood sacrifice to my effigy of Satan by eating another baby.

              • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I promise you nothing is going to get steamrolled, you are simply being very ignorant.

                In fact, I will @ you with a reminder in 30 days as a reply to this message of how mundane and routine everything is to prove you are wrong.

            • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Right, so nobody’s stopping you from joining threads, or making your own instance. You can call it evil.villain. Why don’t you?

          • ∟⊔⊤∦∣≶@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s sarcasm. I upvoted them because I would have said something similar to highlight the absurdity of any argument against defederating with Threads.

        • Deceptichum@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then get fucked?

          Meta are largely responsible for the current state of affairs right now. Nearly every current war, genocide, fake news, and more can be tied back to Meta.

          • BaroqueInMind@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are you seriously simplifying all current conflicts caused down to simply social media? So if we completely remove all social media, humanity instantly becomes the utopian society from science fiction. STFU with this stupidity you ignorant child.

            • Deceptichum@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              13
              ·
              1 year ago

              Simply? No.

              Dangerously and deliberately engageful? Yes.

              Look at the impact of FB in the Rohingya genocide for fucks sake.

              Fucking right wing wanker.

    • sour@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      decentralization purpose is choice to move to other instance

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can spin up your own server… That’s what the fediverse is.

      The freedom to do whatever you want as an admin, and the freedom of choosing another server where you’ll still be part of the network

      Meta/Facebook threatens this, because their user base dwarfs the rest of the fediverse. They’re also running their own closed source server code… They can gatekeep their own federation

      I would love it if companies joined the fediverse, but like, by making instances. Maybe even use it for their internal Intranet. Maybe they could add federation compatible APIs to their existing software

      I don’t want a massive social network company to use their position to make a new social network…

      Federation is like Bitcoin or Tor - it’s decentralized, until one org becomes too large… At that point, they can control the network in countless ways

    • squiblet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m sure there will be instances that remain federated with them, and you can join those… or just join Threadstagram.

      • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is what I’m thinking. I don’t understand why people fled from the corporate internet only to be excited to go back to them.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          The corporate internet is adopting an open protocol. I find that to be exciting. It’s not us “going back” to the corporate internet, it’s the corporate internet coming to us.

          • dezmd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            All of the corporate internet adopted open protocols in the first place. Expand your limited view and increase your awareness of the history of the networks as they evolved before Google, Microsoft, and Apple were beginning and end of tech. We got to now with open protocols. Now everything is being walled up by DRM since theyve managed to preintegrate it in all of the hardware across the board before the open protocols even come into play.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      So… admins aren’t free to choose? Why are you trying to take away admins freedom of choice? Sounds kind of authoritarian to me.

      • Chozo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If you’re self-hosting a personal instance, do whatever you want.

        But if you’re hosting a community for other people, you should consider what they want. That’s the responsibility of a community leader.

        • Zorque@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s the beauty of the fediverse, if the instance you’re on isn’t doing what you want, you can move to another one. Or create your own.

          I’d say that’s a pretty clear indicator of the popularity of decisions. Saying “No, you can’t do that, cause I don’t want that” is putting your desires above the desires of others.

    • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      When you fuck over people with their freedoms, you don’t deserve the freedom to be extended to you.

      It’s the same as paradox of tolerance. You shouldn’t be tolerant to intolerance, and you shouldn’t give freedom to those who want to strip it away from you.

      That’s like freedom 101.