Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you’re a server admin, please defederate Meta’s domain “threads.net

If you don’t run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate “threads.net”.

  • glukoza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    That is naive look on it. Meta(Facebook) is a company, it’s always company interest and only company interest. The idea of fediverse is to stay out of data tracking, user profiling, not to help it in any way. Connecting with meta is workoing aginst fediverse. It might be a mistake fediverse never recovers from, even now it’s really small fedi community.

    Why would we as fedi users, mods and admins help meta or any other company, for what, for their interest that they sell on “we love fediverse”, “cusotmer first” bla bla bla.

    • Skeletonek@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Idea of Fediverse is to provide decentralized network of social servers connected to each other. Defederation is an optional feature if some instance would go rogue. For now, connecting with Threads is not against Fediverse, it’s the opposite. Connecting with Threads fullfills the idea of Fediverse.

        • Skeletonek@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          How it will kill Fedi? Many people here are against big corporations so they will never quit Lemmy instance to move to Threads. But connecting to Threads will bring many new users. We can teach them the great power of Fediverse. We can communicate with each other despite having data on separate servers and anybody can choose an instance that is closer to their beliefs and opinions.

          • glukoza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Same how google killed xmpp, how big tech killed email. Meta and big tech are just too powerful and they can destroy, takeover fedi with resources they have.

            • Skeletonek@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Last time I checked XMPP and e-mails are working just fine. I don’t know what you mean. How exactly Meta will kill Fedi?

              • glukoza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                With xmpp you could chat with people on messenger just by having xmpp account somewhere else. Now you cannot. And no email is not working just fine, self hosting email is hard now beacuse you are getting blocked if you are using big tech servers.

                XMPP has it’s own problems, not really pleasant user experience etc. But yes, facebook first embraced it the cut you off anyone you had on messenger.

                If this happens, meta will takeover fedi.

                • Skeletonek@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I really don’t understand this. We want to block them now, because they will block us later and this will kill Fediverse. I don’t see a point really. Wouldn’t blocking them kill Fedi even faster? As far as I know, Lemmy is slowly losing it’s users. Letting them in will only strengthen Fediverse.

                  • glukoza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Now, fedi then develops in autonomus manner, as much as possible. There are problems with centralization on fedi even now without meta.

                    Letting them in will only help meta EEE(embrace, extened, extinguish) it.

          • glukoza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Which still doesn’t mean fedi should cooperate with meta or any other big tech, I dare to say not even with any company.

              • glukoza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                This is not cooperation, this is take over by meta. So far I see most fedi users are aganist federation with meta, I’m glad that’s the case.

              • Natanael@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Facebook / meta has too much history of abuse. OTOH I don’t think it’s necessary to fully defederate, but setting a server defaults per-account to filter their instance would reduce their influence and risk of abuse while still allowing people to opt in to connecting to them

        • pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          He’s just some paid shill. They’ve been infiltrating Lemmy for months. Don’t even waste breath arguing with them. Just downvote them, jot down their screennames and warn others not to listen to them. Arguing with them directly is what they want so they can convince others there’s a legitimate debate to be had.

              • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Thanks for your concern about me!

                Don’t worry, I do use threads and enjoy it quite a bit!

                It’s easily the friendliest social media I’ve ever used, and I’ve never even had a Facebook account!

                It’s sweet you think lil ole us using the internet actually affects things on the grand scheme of billions of users, though! Bless your heart!

                  • money_loo@1337lemmy.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I am on Threads my guy, this is the internet you can be in multiple places at once.

                    Also, how am I bothering everyone else?

                    Are y’all not ganging up on me and my opinion? Does it bother you guys to be bullies to someone for sharing a dissenting voice to yours?

                    I’m sorry if having a choice bothers you, I’m sorry if hearing something opposite of what you want bothers you.

                    Nobody is asking you to be a jerk to people who differ in what they would like.

          • glukoza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            l o l, how you deduce I’m a “paid shill”. you sound more like paid shill tbh, even you probably aren’t

            edit: now I see i probably i misunderstood you, sorry

    • DaBPunkt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Imaging for a moment all non-company-mail-servers would block all company-mail-servers (like gmail). Would that be a good idea?

      • otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Your argument is inherently flawed and born of confident ignorance. You can do better.

      • glukoza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, that would be a great idea because it would free the email protocol taken over by all big tech.

        • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The more I think about it, you’re right. Having email in the hands of a few for-profit tech giants has really damaged the entire concept of email. Every day, I see comments about people whose unique email servers are automatically filtered by Google and Microsoft’s platforms. It would be massively beneficial to block all the big companies and have a healthier ecosystem like we have here in the fediverse.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        This isn’t email. Email wasn’t built purposefully able to block entire instances of email. Terrible comparison