• APassenger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My point was simple: a law or policy, unenforced, is neither law nor policy.

    We all know it to be true but then some pause and give a pass to platitude of “against policy.” Same applies to US police.

    I’m not changing the topic. I’m saying people need to challenge these statements more vocally.

    Edit to add: You’re saying I said things I didn’t, missing the point, and have derailed an important point of agreement.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s true, but policy or law, even when unenforced, still leaves absolute scope for those rules to be clamped down on.

      • APassenger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Are you in any way saying that their official “policy” is something they’re going to enforce? Because that’s a big swing from where you started this branch.

        I think you need to pick a side and stay there. I’m not saying this from a combative standpoint. I just want you to pick.

        Otherwise this looks like just scoring points and not a conversation.

        Do you believe the IDF will enforce their engagement policy?

        Edited briefly for clarity and tense.