• The Nexus of Privacy@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the short term, they’ll be much smaller than Meta’s fediverse (because mastodon.social and most of the big instances are federating with Threads) and of course much smaller than Threads. Longer term, we’ll see, but I wouldn’t expect them to be as big as Threads for a long time if ever.

    • blue_berry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ok, I may have blown the discussion a bit out of proposition earlier. It’s just that I thought you meant basically the whole Fediverse. The name “Free Fediverse” is a bit misleading imo.

      • The Nexus of Privacy@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, one of my takeaways is that I should have been clearer that this isn’t a proposal for the whole fediverse. And not sure what the best term to use is, “free fediverses” is what I’m going with for now (based on the freefediverse.org).

        • blue_berry@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Free fediverse(s) makes sense, building on top of that already floating term sounds sensible

          • The Nexus of Privacy@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            How about this as a revised first sentence to clarify the focus is on an alternative (not the whole fediverse)?

            As I discuss in the first post in the series, the “free fediverses” are regions of the fediverse that reject Meta and surveillance capitalism, and these strategies position the free fediverses as an alternative to Threads and “Meta’s fediverses”.