Young people in China are becoming more rebellious, questioning their nation’s traditional expectations of career and family

  • Coreidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    What? This illustrates exactly why it’s an important question.

    If you’re responsible for hiring are you going to hire someone who has gaps in their resume or someone that’s been consistently working?

    The person with gaps on their resume is more likely to quit on you. You aren’t going to hire someone who looks like they will quit.

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The actual solution is to figure out why work sucks so hard that people find loopholes like this to get around it. If i can work 4 months out of the year and take care of myself, why would you want to eork any more?

      • Coreidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed but employers don’t care. They are the ones with the power. Having you work 60 hours a week is a means of control. If you quit there is a line of people out there that’s willing to take the job. Employers know this and exploit it.

        If you think you can change this power dynamic then go for it, but there are too many desperate people out there for that to happen.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      one of the problems of modern work environments is that workplaces get saturated with people who actually should leave but don’t. It is a bullshit question even if (like many modern problems) it would make sense if we were still in an era where corporations valued long term employees and mutual loyalty was a thing that existed.