• disablist@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Good is relative. What you mean is that there isn’t a perfect solution. Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.

    So if your argument is that a two state solution isn’t perfect, therefore we shouldn’t do it, then that’s tacit approval for my first solution…a final solution if you will. Just pick a side, and poof.

    If you’re not comfortable with genocide, then a two state solution is the only viable path forward with any hope of chance of being made into a good outcome, even if not a perfect one.

    So pick one: a final solution or a two-state solution, but stop with the wishy-washy “the status quo must remain until a perfect solution is found”.

    • Rolder@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Don’t get me wrong I’d love a two state solution or really any solution where they stop killing each other. But in order for a two state solution to happen, you need both sides to agree on the borders, and good luck with that.

      • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Just remind the Israeli government who holds the biggest stick and which hand feeds them.

        • Rolder@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Reminder that the UN has tried to implement the two state solution before but the Arab side said “No we want all of it”